- Posts: 499
- Thank you received: 0
Sunshine : the physics behind. no spoilers so dont worry!
- fguihen
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
17 years 8 months ago #43870
by fguihen
Sunshine : the physics behind. no spoilers so dont worry! was created by fguihen
I know few people have seen the movie "Sunshine" yet, but my friend in the IFI has, and he says that to keep the sun alive, they want to attempt to set off a nuclear bomb the size of an american state in the core of the sun to keep it alive ( this much is in the paper anyway so no spoiler!). From my basic basic understanding, setting off a nuclear warhead in the sun wil only help for a very short time. should they not be attempting to place huge quantities of hydrogen and helium into the suns core to replenish its diminishing fuel source?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
17 years 8 months ago #43871
by Seanie_Morris
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: Sunshine : the physics behind. no spoilers so dont worry!
I don't think it could happen anyway. I mean, nothing in the Universe is able to survive the extreme temperatures and pressures our Sun would have in its 'mantle', let alone the core! Hence why everything is in a nuclear state within.
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
17 years 8 months ago #43875
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: Sunshine : the physics behind. no spoilers so dont worry!
Every second 6 million tonnes of hydrogen is converted into pure energy at the suns core! (use E=MC2 to estimate the amount of energy), not to speak of how much hydogen is needed in the first place for that to happen given that most of the hydrogen in a nuclear reaction is turned into helium.
Go figure the size of the nuclear bomb that would be !!
Setting off any currently existing nuclear warhead near/at or in the sun is like throwing a smartie at an oncoming train going 100MPH. As for one the size of north america, I still can imagine it would have any effect on something the size of the sun. I doubt all the world nuclear bombs going off together could sustain the sun for more then a nano second.
Go figure the size of the nuclear bomb that would be !!
Setting off any currently existing nuclear warhead near/at or in the sun is like throwing a smartie at an oncoming train going 100MPH. As for one the size of north america, I still can imagine it would have any effect on something the size of the sun. I doubt all the world nuclear bombs going off together could sustain the sun for more then a nano second.
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
17 years 8 months ago #43877
by Seanie_Morris
I doubt we could even come close, even with e.g. 10,000 times as many warheads. The reason being, the Sun (and any star burning at all) uses nuclear FUSSION - we have mostly fission (atomic)-based weapons instead. Weight for weight of raw material, fusion is about a couple hundred times more powerful than fission, and even more when right. Even at that, to yield the same energy as 6 million tonnes of hydrogen-based explosion (in a star) per second? Impossible! The United States alone can only produce about 7.8 million tonnes of hydrogen a year!
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: Sunshine : the physics behind. no spoilers so dont worry!
I doubt all the world nuclear bombs going off together could sustain the sun for more then a nano second.
I doubt we could even come close, even with e.g. 10,000 times as many warheads. The reason being, the Sun (and any star burning at all) uses nuclear FUSSION - we have mostly fission (atomic)-based weapons instead. Weight for weight of raw material, fusion is about a couple hundred times more powerful than fission, and even more when right. Even at that, to yield the same energy as 6 million tonnes of hydrogen-based explosion (in a star) per second? Impossible! The United States alone can only produce about 7.8 million tonnes of hydrogen a year!
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pmgisme
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 754
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 8 months ago #43879
by pmgisme
Replied by pmgisme on topic Re: Sunshine : the physics behind. no spoilers so dont worry!
The A-bomb uses fission.
The H-bomb("Thermonuclear") uses fusion.
(The H-bomb is so much more powerful it makes the A-bomb look like a firecracker.)
The H-bomb("Thermonuclear") uses fusion.
(The H-bomb is so much more powerful it makes the A-bomb look like a firecracker.)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- philiplardner
- Offline
- Red Giant
17 years 8 months ago #43880
by philiplardner
Replied by philiplardner on topic Re: Sunshine : the physics behind. no spoilers so dont worry!
Hmm... typical american response to most situations - blow it up. As Dave L says, all the warheads in the world wouldn't sustain the sun for a nanosecond - just not enough mass. Now if the americans REALLY wanted to make a global contribution to the survival of the planet, they should send in the Marines (into the sun!) Now there's something with enough density to sustain the sun for ages!
Phil
(bang go my chances of a visa... yippee!!!!)
Phil
(bang go my chances of a visa... yippee!!!!)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.125 seconds