K-Tec

Comparative study of M42

More
16 years 9 months ago #62537 by Euronymous
Replied by Euronymous on topic Re: Comparative study of M42
The light you are gathering in the larger scope is fantastic, especially at the high magnification. I usually don't venture above 50-100x for M42, must give it a try

Celestron C8-N (200mm reflector)
Carl Zeiss 10x50's
-Amateur Astronomer, photographer, guitarist, and beer drinker-

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 9 months ago #62547 by jeyjey
Replied by jeyjey on topic Re: Comparative study of M42

The light you are gathering in the larger scope is fantastic, especially at the high magnification. I usually don't venture above 50-100x for M42, must give it a try

It's sort of the back edge of the "field to narrow" sword. I never tried it either till I moved to the 16". At first I was disappointed that I couldn't fit much of it in the view -- but once you can't fit 100% of it you might as well look at 20% as 40% -- so I started to bump up the magnification.

Another great application of this is the big globulars -- M13 comes to mind -- which is simply wall-to-wall stars at 375x. (Which reminds me -- I must attempt a sketch of it when it comes around again.)

-- Jeff.

Nikon 18x70s / UA Millennium                              Colorado:
Solarscope SF70 / TV Pronto / AP400QMD             Coronado SolarMax40 DS / Bogen 055+3130
APM MC1610 / Tak FC-125 / AP1200GTO               Tak Mewlon 250 / AP600EGTO

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.102 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum