- Posts: 366
- Thank you received: 7
Nexstar and Fastar
- gnason
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Gordon
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dmcdona
- Offline
- Administrator
- Posts: 4557
- Thank you received: 76
Another consideration depends on what deep sky objects you want to image. For those really faint objects, 30 second exposures, no matter how many you stack, are not going to amount to much.
How about forgetting the Fastar and just buying a wedge? You can then image for longer (tracking ability of the mount notwithstanding) or shorter. But I suspect its the f/1.95 that you want...
If you go Fastar, do you have to make sure the imager is as low a profiel as possible to avoid obstructing the lightpath to the primary? I think the Starlight Express cameras are cylindrical and presumably fit the bill....
I'd love to know how you get on
Cheers
Dave
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gnason
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Main Sequence
- Posts: 366
- Thank you received: 7
Gordon, FWIW... The Fastar assembly will doubtless give you short exposures - at F/1.95 its blazingly fast. And as such, the ALt-Az mount would be able to handle those short exposures. Of course, if you took images over an extended period, you'd just need to make sure you software of choice can de-rotate those images.
Another consideration depends on what deep sky objects you want to image. For those really faint objects, 30 second exposures, no matter how many you stack, are not going to amount to much.
Thanks for the advice Dave. I think I would stick with short exposures and bright objects to start with.
How about forgetting the Fastar and just buying a wedge? You can then image for longer (tracking ability of the mount notwithstanding) or shorter. But I suspect its the f/1.95 that you want...
Yes! Fastar was one of the reasons I got the NexStar GPS instead of the newer CPC. It's possible to get f/1.8 with Starizona's Hyperstar alternative but it's a bit more expensive.
If you go Fastar, do you have to make sure the imager is as low a profiel as possible to avoid obstructing the lightpath to the primary? I think the Starlight Express cameras are cylindrical and presumably fit the bill....
Yes, it has to quite a low profile camera such as the ST237A or one of the Starlight Express models. May be a few months before I get all the bits.
Gordon
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- daveg
- Visitor
we're in the process of developing registax v4 which should incl a better rotate section for alt/az mounts. anyway 30 secs at f/1.8 is ok for field rotation
dave gradwell
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gnason
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Main Sequence
- Posts: 366
- Thank you received: 7
we're in the process of developing registax v4 which should incl a better rotate section for alt/az mounts. anyway 30 secs at f/1.8 is ok for field rotation. dave gradwell
Thanks Dave. Looking forward to v.4.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.