- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
AR1032 - 02 January 2010
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
14 years 11 months ago #82878
by michaeloconnell
AR1032 - 02 January 2010 was created by michaeloconnell
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DeirdreKelleghan
- Offline
- IFAS Social Media Officer
Less
More
- Posts: 1509
- Thank you received: 47
14 years 11 months ago #82880
by DeirdreKelleghan
Replied by DeirdreKelleghan on topic Re:AR1032 - 02 January 2010
Looks real good Michael , I must take a peek before it vanishes.
Deirdre Kelleghan
Vice Char IFAS
Outreach IFAS
www.irishastronomy.org/
www.deirdrekelleghan.com/
twitter.com/skysketcher
Deirdre Kelleghan
Vice Char IFAS
Outreach IFAS
www.irishastronomy.org/
www.deirdrekelleghan.com/
twitter.com/skysketcher
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frank Ryan
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 3298
- Thank you received: 57
14 years 11 months ago #82897
by Frank Ryan
My Astrophotography
Shannonside Astronomy Club __________________________________________
Meade ETX-125PE, Bresser 10 x 50 Binos & Me Peepers
Replied by Frank Ryan on topic Re:AR1032 - 02 January 2010
Wow. nice work!
I wouldn't be able to stop myself from adding a yellow tint to it!
I wouldn't be able to stop myself from adding a yellow tint to it!
My Astrophotography
Shannonside Astronomy Club __________________________________________
Meade ETX-125PE, Bresser 10 x 50 Binos & Me Peepers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
14 years 11 months ago - 14 years 11 months ago #82900
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re:AR1032 - 02 January 2010
Very interesting, its looks alot better then what I would expect from a same sized H-alpha PST, do you find that the Cal-K gives consistantly better images photographically or is the better camera?
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Last edit: 14 years 11 months ago by dave_lillis.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
14 years 11 months ago #82901
by michaeloconnell
Replied by michaeloconnell on topic Re:AR1032 - 02 January 2010
To be honest Dave, I haven't gone imaging with it too often, only a few times.
Srange thing with this scope: for an imaging scope, the DMK (and Toucam IIRC) do not come to focus with it directly.
You need a barlow to bring it to focus. Strange! However, to get decent detail you need a use a barlow anyway in my opinion
Some people have unscrewed bits off their PST Ha near the eyepiece to bring it to focus - this doesn't work with the CaK due to the multiple filters which are used.
In terms of image quality, the two frequencies (CaK and Ha) are quite different.
The width of the bandpass for the CaK is actually much wider, so one would think it would be more subject to atmospheric distortion.
Also, visually, its a much fainter image.
However, after having laser eye surgery a few months ago, when I looked through the CaK scope today, the image did seem noticalbly brighter (albeit still fainter than Ha) and the AR region was visible. However, each person's eyes are different. For some, the image is very easy to see, but for others it is invisible.
Srange thing with this scope: for an imaging scope, the DMK (and Toucam IIRC) do not come to focus with it directly.
You need a barlow to bring it to focus. Strange! However, to get decent detail you need a use a barlow anyway in my opinion
Some people have unscrewed bits off their PST Ha near the eyepiece to bring it to focus - this doesn't work with the CaK due to the multiple filters which are used.
In terms of image quality, the two frequencies (CaK and Ha) are quite different.
The width of the bandpass for the CaK is actually much wider, so one would think it would be more subject to atmospheric distortion.
Also, visually, its a much fainter image.
However, after having laser eye surgery a few months ago, when I looked through the CaK scope today, the image did seem noticalbly brighter (albeit still fainter than Ha) and the AR region was visible. However, each person's eyes are different. For some, the image is very easy to see, but for others it is invisible.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
14 years 11 months ago #82903
by michaeloconnell
Replied by michaeloconnell on topic Re:AR1032 - 02 January 2010
Barberskum wrote:
Actually I considered it.
I also considered adding a blue tint to reflect that is a CaK image.
In the end, I just went with mono and keep it simple.
Guess I just have to win a colour DMK camera at the next Burren Star party....
Wow. nice work!
I wouldn't be able to stop myself from adding a yellow tint to it!
Actually I considered it.
I also considered adding a blue tint to reflect that is a CaK image.
In the end, I just went with mono and keep it simple.
Guess I just have to win a colour DMK camera at the next Burren Star party....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.116 seconds