- Posts: 2682
- Thank you received: 549
Off the Beaten track - NGC1893
- Keith g
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
13 years 11 months ago #87791
by Keith g
Off the Beaten track - NGC1893 was created by Keith g
Hi all, I decided to try and learn a litle more using my William optics 110 flt scope and Canon 40D in early January. Starcluster NGC1893 is a nice object in Auriga with some nice neblosity in it along with a distinct 'hole' in it's centre. This is catologued at magnitude 7.5, and 25 arcminutes in size, so I though it would be a good test for the scope.
I shot at ISO1600, with a stack of 49 light frames, and 10 darks at 90 seconds each unguided, plus 5 flat and bias frames, although I am still being killed by vignetting. I know the colour balance is a little off, but I am learning at snail's pace due to all the recent cold weather and not being able to get out....
Does anybody have a great tip for the vignetting, what am I doing wrong?? Thanks.
www.flickr.com/photos/79652716@N00/5364925324/
Keith..
I shot at ISO1600, with a stack of 49 light frames, and 10 darks at 90 seconds each unguided, plus 5 flat and bias frames, although I am still being killed by vignetting. I know the colour balance is a little off, but I am learning at snail's pace due to all the recent cold weather and not being able to get out....
Does anybody have a great tip for the vignetting, what am I doing wrong?? Thanks.
www.flickr.com/photos/79652716@N00/5364925324/
Keith..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dmcdona
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 4557
- Thank you received: 76
13 years 11 months ago #87792
by dmcdona
Replied by dmcdona on topic Re: Off the Beaten track - NGC1893
Keith - that's a nice image. Keep at it and it'll pay off.
As regards vignetting, I really don't see any in the posted image (unless you cropped the offending areas). My only suggestion would be flat frames. I'd suggest five is a bit low. Perhaps 10 or even 20 would be better.
Don't forget - the flats are "divided" into the light frames.
One other note, if your darks are the same exposure duration as your lights, you don't need to use a bias frame. Bias frames are handy if you dark exposure duration does *not* match your light exposure duration...
HTH
Dave
As regards vignetting, I really don't see any in the posted image (unless you cropped the offending areas). My only suggestion would be flat frames. I'd suggest five is a bit low. Perhaps 10 or even 20 would be better.
Don't forget - the flats are "divided" into the light frames.
One other note, if your darks are the same exposure duration as your lights, you don't need to use a bias frame. Bias frames are handy if you dark exposure duration does *not* match your light exposure duration...
HTH
Dave
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phoenix
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 857
- Thank you received: 29
13 years 11 months ago #87793
by phoenix
Kieran
16" ODK (incoming), Mesu Mount 200, APM TMB 80mm, SXV H16, SXV H9
J16 An Carraig Observatory
ancarraigobservatory.co.uk/
Replied by phoenix on topic Re: Off the Beaten track - NGC1893
I was going to suggest Pixinsight LE which was a free download and great at getting rid of vignetting but they have pulled the download from the Pleiades Astrophoto S.L. site. I guess too many people were using the freeware and not buying.
Kieran
16" ODK (incoming), Mesu Mount 200, APM TMB 80mm, SXV H16, SXV H9
J16 An Carraig Observatory
ancarraigobservatory.co.uk/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- carlobeirnes
- Offline
- IFAS Sponsor & Astronomer of the Year 2013
Less
More
- Posts: 1424
- Thank you received: 147
13 years 11 months ago - 13 years 11 months ago #87812
by carlobeirnes
Carl O’Beirnes,
Scopes and Space Ltd,
Unit A8 Airside Enterprise Centre,
Swords, Co Dublin,
Ireland.
www.scopesandspace.ie/
www.facebook.com/scopesandspace
twitter.com/ScopesandSpace
www.youtube.com/user/ScopesandSpace
Replied by carlobeirnes on topic Re: Off the Beaten track - NGC1893
Thats is very good Keith. Dave is right you must get flats This would be Ideal for the 110mm
Have a look here this is the road I went down and works great
www.themcdonalds.net/~themcdo/richard/in..._Light_Box_for_SV80S
Carl
Have a look here this is the road I went down and works great
www.themcdonalds.net/~themcdo/richard/in..._Light_Box_for_SV80S
Carl
Carl O’Beirnes,
Scopes and Space Ltd,
Unit A8 Airside Enterprise Centre,
Swords, Co Dublin,
Ireland.
www.scopesandspace.ie/
www.facebook.com/scopesandspace
twitter.com/ScopesandSpace
www.youtube.com/user/ScopesandSpace
Last edit: 13 years 11 months ago by carlobeirnes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
13 years 11 months ago #87821
by Seanie_Morris
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: Off the Beaten track - NGC1893
Nice image Keith, focus looks to be a little bit of an issue or maybe that's just me? Some nice nebulosity all the same.
Seanie.
Seanie.
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Keith g
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 2682
- Thank you received: 549
13 years 11 months ago #87853
by Keith g
Replied by Keith g on topic Re: Off the Beaten track - NGC1893
Ah thanks guys for taking the time to reply, I'll definitely work on the flats, and i'll use no bias frames so, that's ok! I did crop the frame to remove most of the vignetting, so it doesn't look as bad there.
Pity about the pixinsight, oh well thanks for the tip Kieran and the link Carl, I'll follow it up. As for the focus, yes Seanie, the stars look a little large due to the processing, but overall I am happy with this so far.
Looking forward to dragging the CGE mount out again since my set up is portable
Keith..
Pity about the pixinsight, oh well thanks for the tip Kieran and the link Carl, I'll follow it up. As for the focus, yes Seanie, the stars look a little large due to the processing, but overall I am happy with this so far.
Looking forward to dragging the CGE mount out again since my set up is portable
Keith..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.143 seconds