Hubble photon mass at rest = 5.81e-66/9e16 ?

This is where I believe the laws of physics and of the science that follows suite remains in flux, whereas few things are of an absolute constant within this ever changing universe. All remains in motion and is impacted by the surrounding environment, thereby all remains in flux, thus a variable equation based upon other variables should be the norm rather than the exception.

Here's my conjecture or basis for absolute insanity;
Photons at rest are those merely residing in a state of minimum flux, of which a sufficient volume of such resting photons could be perceived as dark matter, yet as such NOT standing absolutely still. Whereas the resting photon offers a somewhat singular but variable dimension of length and thereby of the volume of said photons/m3 varies as per the surrounding environment and coexistence with atoms permits, thereby it seems we have no constant upon which the dimension of a photon nor of its' density/volume exist, whereas the frequency of modulation and/or of the amplitude aspects of a given photon that is NOT at rest is offering a further variable that's none less complex than the variance upon physical speed or speed of erg/transfer conduction.

I offer my 10 dimensions of a photon at rest = 6.4555e-83:

1-D = Wavelength (as unmodulated, as at rest = 0e0 to 9e16 meters)
2-D = Modulation or erg/photon of 0 to 100% (100% AM/FM = wavelength)
3-D = Volume/m3 (entirely spectrum plus erg/modulation dependent)
4-D = Volume/m3/s (KE/s=MV2 per spectrum plus erg dependent)
5-D = Amplitude/Frequency Modulation (a quantum status of any given photon)
6-D = Photon mass at rest (from 0 to not more than 1 m/s)
7-D = Photon mass at speed (1 m/s to 3e8 m/s or perhaps 9e16 m/s)
8-D = Coexistence with atoms, or rather the atomic Oort zones of atoms
9-D = Photonic mode of conduction (by all standards being a mode of super conduction)
10-D = The quantum matrix of any or all of the above, and perhaps then some

Perhaps if the technology and minds of today had existed during the time of Einstein, surely there'd be no absolute constant of "light speed", nor would his photon have represented "zero mass".

I'm perceiving that only deceptions and continuing lies create and sustain constants. The act or code of silence in itself (physics 5th amendment) becomes just another example of a perpetrated lie in the face of a worthy challenge to the mainstream status quo.

I hereby challenge the mainstream status quo by asking these questions;

1) at absolute zero gravity (inter-galactic gravity-well null), how many atoms exist per m3?
2) how many photons of those at rest are capable of fitting into a zero-gravity m3?
3) how many energised photons per spectrum or community of spectrums are there per m3?
4) is there a monospectrum or monochromatic status of null-wavelength for a typical photon at rest?
5) are photons in motion, or is there a conduction/transference of photon ergs/mass taking place?
6) since speed of a photon or of a transfer/conduction mode isn't constant, what are the limits?
7) within a universe, or a given representative portion thereof, what's the ratio of photons per atom?

Feel free as to correct upon and/or to moderate or even add to what I'm trying to stipulate, as I'm in one of my typical village idiot learning curves that seems to have established another vortex associated with one of those intellectually touchy blackholes, or perhaps there's merely a serious load of photonic dark matter residing at the termination point.

I hereby challenge the mainstream status quo by asking these questions;

1) at absolute zero gravity (inter-galactic gravity-well null), how many atoms exist per m3?

This makes absolutely no sense because if there are atoms present t hen it is impossible to have zero gravity. Atoms have mass so they cause gravity.

2) how many photons of those at rest are capable of fitting into a zero-gravity m3?

You cann't have photons at rest in free space! The only way ot have zero gravity is to have a vacuum and in a vacuum light (i.e. photons) travel at the speed of light. So the answer is none becaue you cann't HAVE any photons at rest in a zero gravity m^3.

3) how many energised photons per spectrum or community of spectrums are there per m3?

I don't understand this question at all.

4) is there a monospectrum or monochromatic status of null-wavelength for a typical photon at rest?

Again, photons don't rest!

5) are photons in motion, or is there a conduction/transference of photon ergs/mass taking place?

yes

6) since speed of a photon or of a transfer/conduction mode isn't constant, what are the limits?

The speed of light in a vacuum is constant, you can get differnt speeds in different media though. All media slow light down so the fastest it can go is the speed of light.

7) within a universe, or a given representative portion thereof, what's the ratio of photons per atom?

That depends on where you take your sample! Take it at teh sun and you will get many more photons than atoms!

Feel free as to correct upon and/or to moderate or even add to what I'm trying to stipulate, as I'm in one of my typical village idiot learning curves that seems to have established another vortex associated with one of those intellectually touchy blackholes, or perhaps there's merely a serious load of photonic dark matter residing at the termination point.

bradguth-gasa-ieis wrote: T

Here's my conjecture or basis for absolute insanity;

/quote]

You said it Brad!

As Bart has already said - photons have mass, thus they must have gravity. Photons do not remain at rest. Since these are your two main conjectures to base your arguments on, therefore the rest of your arguement is gobbledegook!!!

Brian

T

Here's my conjecture or basis for absolute insanity;

You said it Brad!

As Bart has already said - photons have mass, thus they must have gravity. Photons do not remain at rest. Since these are your two main conjectures to base your arguments on, therefore the rest of your arguement is gobbledegook!!!

Brian

Errr ... I never said photons have mass, they are massless particles, saying they have mass would be gobeldegook!

Atoms however I did say have mass!

Errr ... I never said photons have mass, they are massless particles, saying they have mass would be gobeldegook!

Atoms however I did say have mass!

Oops, you're right! Sorry, in a froth of righteous indignation

Simply put:

A photon is massless because it is born and exist in a state of continuous motion (speed of light) - it only contains energy.