- Posts: 3663
- Thank you received: 2
Betelgeuse
- paulevans
- Topic Author
- Visitor
17 years 11 months ago #39624
by paulevans
Betelgeuse was created by paulevans
Looking at Orion this evening I have convinced myself that Betelgeuse is brighter than Rigel which isn't supposed to be the case as Rigel is listed as 0.15 and Betelgeuse is supposed to be max 0.3 min 1.2.
I asked my wife which she thought was brighter and she said Betelgeuse too.
Is anyone else able to have a look? Is it possible that Betelgeuse, which is variable and indeed a candidate supernova, is in some sort of mild brightening phase?
Paul
I asked my wife which she thought was brighter and she said Betelgeuse too.
Is anyone else able to have a look? Is it possible that Betelgeuse, which is variable and indeed a candidate supernova, is in some sort of mild brightening phase?
Paul
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- voyager
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
17 years 11 months ago #39628
by voyager
My Home Page - www.bartbusschots.ie
Replied by voyager on topic Re: Betelgeuse
Something to bear in mind is that Rigel is signifficantly lower down compared to Betelgeuse so that could be having a slight effect.
Bart.
Bart.
My Home Page - www.bartbusschots.ie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- stepryan
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 746
- Thank you received: 27
17 years 11 months ago #39629
by stepryan
that is true but if you look at the link below from the aavso it appears it is getting brighter
AAVSO link
*Edited by Seanie Morris: link edited so that the looong link would not stretch 3 page widths!
Replied by stepryan on topic Re: Betelgeuse
Something to bear in mind is that Rigel is signifficantly lower down compared to Betelgeuse so that could be having a slight effect.
Bart.
that is true but if you look at the link below from the aavso it appears it is getting brighter
AAVSO link
*Edited by Seanie Morris: link edited so that the looong link would not stretch 3 page widths!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Keith g
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 2682
- Thank you received: 549
17 years 11 months ago #39630
by Keith g
Replied by Keith g on topic Re:
Hi Paul, why don't you ask your question here:
aavso-discussion@aavso.org
Keith..
aavso-discussion@aavso.org
Keith..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paulevans
- Topic Author
- Visitor
17 years 11 months ago #39631
by paulevans
Replied by paulevans on topic Re: Betelgeuse
I'll ask!
Will the answer come back by email?
Clear skies,
Paul.
Will the answer come back by email?
Clear skies,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JohnONeill
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 612
- Thank you received: 138
17 years 11 months ago #39679
by JohnONeill
Replied by JohnONeill on topic Betelgeuse variability
Hi,
A few points need to be considered:
1. As already pointed out Betelgeuse is higher than Rigel. Try to observe Betelgeuse and any comparison star when both are high in the sky, i.e. when they are near the Meridian and not too different in altitude. This reduces any differential extinction.
2. Betelgeuse is a red star which can cause it to appear brighter. Try putting both stars out of focus. This is where people wearing glasses have an advantage, just take them off.
3. Beware of any thin, almost imperceptible cloud.
4. Do not be biased by other peoples observations. The magnitude limits given are not hard and fast.
There is a lot a scatter in the AAVSO raw data. Keep on estimating!
John
A few points need to be considered:
1. As already pointed out Betelgeuse is higher than Rigel. Try to observe Betelgeuse and any comparison star when both are high in the sky, i.e. when they are near the Meridian and not too different in altitude. This reduces any differential extinction.
2. Betelgeuse is a red star which can cause it to appear brighter. Try putting both stars out of focus. This is where people wearing glasses have an advantage, just take them off.
3. Beware of any thin, almost imperceptible cloud.
4. Do not be biased by other peoples observations. The magnitude limits given are not hard and fast.
There is a lot a scatter in the AAVSO raw data. Keep on estimating!
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.121 seconds