- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
Astronomical Seeing
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
10 years 2 months ago #101765
by michaeloconnell
Astronomical Seeing was created by michaeloconnell
To follow on from my previous thread on
Optical Quality and Effects of Secondary
here's a thread on Astronomical Seeing.
Couple of interesting pieces of info in Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_seein...ription_of_r0_and_t0
and
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fried_parameter
To summarise the second link as I understand it.:
If you are using a small telescope where the scope is not pushing the limitations of the atmosphere, the optical quality of the mirrors/lenses will be the limiting factor.
If you are using a large aperture scope, the atmospheric turbulence will be the limiting factor.
To exceed the atmospheric limit, adaptive optics are required.
Michael.
here's a thread on Astronomical Seeing.
Couple of interesting pieces of info in Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_seein...ription_of_r0_and_t0
and
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fried_parameter
To summarise the second link as I understand it.:
If you are using a small telescope where the scope is not pushing the limitations of the atmosphere, the optical quality of the mirrors/lenses will be the limiting factor.
If you are using a large aperture scope, the atmospheric turbulence will be the limiting factor.
To exceed the atmospheric limit, adaptive optics are required.
Michael.
The following user(s) said Thank You: dave_lillis
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
10 years 2 months ago - 10 years 2 months ago #101770
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Astronomical Seeing
Yea, I completely agree from what I see at the scope. The BIG factor in the big dob is the atmospherics caused by heat on the primary, I have only on a rare number of times got to the point where I've been limited by the optics, nothing you can do about bad seeing caused by the jetstream...
to put it in an equation,
Mirror heat + tube currents = image death + swearing +
to put it in an equation,
Mirror heat + tube currents = image death + swearing +
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Last edit: 10 years 2 months ago by dave_lillis.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
10 years 2 months ago #101773
by michaeloconnell
Replied by michaeloconnell on topic Astronomical Seeing
Also worth reading Page 30 of "Advanced Optics for Astronomical Telescopes"
books.google.ie/books?id=-0aAWyckS_8C&pg...cal%20seeing&f=false
books.google.ie/books?id=-0aAWyckS_8C&pg...cal%20seeing&f=false
The following user(s) said Thank You: dave_lillis
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.098 seconds