Which Go-To
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
19 years 6 months ago #12143
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: Which Go-To
Thanks for the dose of reality Albert.
you're dead right, if you want to pay thousands for the mount, then you'll get what you pay for.
you're dead right, if you want to pay thousands for the mount, then you'll get what you pay for.
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Neill
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 732
- Thank you received: 986
19 years 6 months ago #12151
by Neill
Replied by Neill on topic Which Go-To
Hey everyone,
Thanks for all the feedback - I agree with you Simon about the new ETX colour - looks really bad. I have only been at astronomy for 3 years really and only joined clubs in the last 2 - my sky knowledge is poor, this is why I am looking for a go-to to see objects beyond the norm like the Moon, Jupiter, Saturn, Orion Nebula etc. Having a Tal as my first scope with its very solid metal stand - portability is a biggie for me this time around - I know the ETX 125 has limited light grasp compared to the LXD 75 6 inch SNT - but it is supposedly easy to set up and use and highly portable.
Thanks for all the feedback - I agree with you Simon about the new ETX colour - looks really bad. I have only been at astronomy for 3 years really and only joined clubs in the last 2 - my sky knowledge is poor, this is why I am looking for a go-to to see objects beyond the norm like the Moon, Jupiter, Saturn, Orion Nebula etc. Having a Tal as my first scope with its very solid metal stand - portability is a biggie for me this time around - I know the ETX 125 has limited light grasp compared to the LXD 75 6 inch SNT - but it is supposedly easy to set up and use and highly portable.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SimonLogan
- Offline
- Proto Star
Less
More
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 0
19 years 6 months ago #12170
by SimonLogan
Neill, you're only talking about 5" vs 6" so I can't see it making that much difference.
Simon
Replied by SimonLogan on topic Re: Which Go-To
... I know the ETX 125 has limited light grasp compared to the LXD 75 6 inch SNT - but it is supposedly easy to set up and use and highly portable.
Neill, you're only talking about 5" vs 6" so I can't see it making that much difference.
Simon
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- albertw
- Offline
- IFAS Secretary
Less
More
- Posts: 4173
- Thank you received: 181
19 years 6 months ago #12171
by albertw
ETX125 is a 5" Mak; 138mm diameter with a 39.4mm central obstruction. That gives an area of 14949 - 1218 =13731 mm^2
The 6" SNT 152mm diameter ;54mm central obstruction. Gives an area of 18136 - 2289 = 15847 mm^2. About 15% more light gathering than the 5" ETX.
Cheers,
~Al
Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/
Replied by albertw on topic Re: Which Go-To
... I know the ETX 125 has limited light grasp compared to the LXD 75 6 inch SNT - but it is supposedly easy to set up and use and highly portable.
Neill, you're only talking about 5" vs 6" so I can't see it making that much difference.
ETX125 is a 5" Mak; 138mm diameter with a 39.4mm central obstruction. That gives an area of 14949 - 1218 =13731 mm^2
The 6" SNT 152mm diameter ;54mm central obstruction. Gives an area of 18136 - 2289 = 15847 mm^2. About 15% more light gathering than the 5" ETX.
Cheers,
~Al
Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.109 seconds