- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
question on focusers
- jfa15ie
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Proto Star
Less
More
21 years 1 month ago #1299
by jfa15ie
question on focusers was created by jfa15ie
Hello folks
Hoping someone can educate me.
I am fairly new to astronomy and am considering buying a telescope with a 2" focuser. Does this present any problems using a 1.25" eyepiece? What are the relevent issues regarding the relative size of the focuser and the eyepiece?
Yours in ignorance
James
Hoping someone can educate me.
I am fairly new to astronomy and am considering buying a telescope with a 2" focuser. Does this present any problems using a 1.25" eyepiece? What are the relevent issues regarding the relative size of the focuser and the eyepiece?
Yours in ignorance
James
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
21 years 4 weeks ago #1304
by Seanie_Morris
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: question on focusers
Hi james,
If the focuser is a permanenet one on the telescope tube, then you hav 2 choices:
1) You can use your existing 1.25" eyepieces with the 2" focuser, but you will have to get an adapter (2" down to 1.25") which your eyepieces sit in, in the focuser. Or
2) buy some new 2" eyepieces! ( www.andromedaoptics.com might be able to help)
Hope this is of some help!
Seanie.
If the focuser is a permanenet one on the telescope tube, then you hav 2 choices:
1) You can use your existing 1.25" eyepieces with the 2" focuser, but you will have to get an adapter (2" down to 1.25") which your eyepieces sit in, in the focuser. Or
2) buy some new 2" eyepieces! ( www.andromedaoptics.com might be able to help)
Hope this is of some help!
Seanie.
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gnason
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 366
- Thank you received: 7
21 years 4 weeks ago #1305
by gnason
Absolutely no problems at all. Many refractors and indeed other types, come with 2" focusers. You can quite happily use a 2" focuser with a 1.25" diagonal and 1.25" eyepieces. It also gives you the option of using a 2" diagonal and 2" eyepieces. 2" diagonals normally come with a 1.25" adapter so you can use your 1.25" eyepieces as well, although this arrangement brings no extra benefits over a 1.25" diagonal.
Hope this explains what you asked.
Gordon
Replied by gnason on topic Re: question on focusers
I am fairly new to astronomy and am considering buying a telescope with a 2" focuser. Does this present any problems using a 1.25" eyepiece? What are the relevent issues regarding the relative size of the focuser and the eyepiece?
James
Absolutely no problems at all. Many refractors and indeed other types, come with 2" focusers. You can quite happily use a 2" focuser with a 1.25" diagonal and 1.25" eyepieces. It also gives you the option of using a 2" diagonal and 2" eyepieces. 2" diagonals normally come with a 1.25" adapter so you can use your 1.25" eyepieces as well, although this arrangement brings no extra benefits over a 1.25" diagonal.
Hope this explains what you asked.
Gordon
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
21 years 4 weeks ago #1313
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: question on focusers
Hi,
As far as I can make out, there are really 2 reasons for going to a 2" focuser.
1, Alot of the wide field of view eyepieces are 2".
2, Photography/imaging, 35mm film photography is better done with a 2" barrel, it wont ge long from now when CCD cameras requiring 2" barrels will be (relatively) cheaply available (I hope).
I think its best to have a 2 inch focuser, this gives you the choice of using either 2" or 1.25" eyepieces instead of been stuck with one size, a choice is always better (adapters are easily available).
As far as I can make out, there are really 2 reasons for going to a 2" focuser.
1, Alot of the wide field of view eyepieces are 2".
2, Photography/imaging, 35mm film photography is better done with a 2" barrel, it wont ge long from now when CCD cameras requiring 2" barrels will be (relatively) cheaply available (I hope).
I think its best to have a 2 inch focuser, this gives you the choice of using either 2" or 1.25" eyepieces instead of been stuck with one size, a choice is always better (adapters are easily available).
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jfa15ie
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Proto Star
Less
More
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 3 weeks ago #1367
by jfa15ie
Replied by jfa15ie on topic Re: question on focusers
Sean, Gordon, Dave
Thanks for the sound advice.
James
Thanks for the sound advice.
James
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.115 seconds