Moving On
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
16 years 9 months ago #60974
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: Moving On
Hi Jonathan,
You'll definitely see more in a 10" scope, with objects such as globular clusters you will so the most differance, they will go from been fuzzy blobs to been someway resolved into stars on the most part, and objects like the orion nebula will appear brighter and more detailed. I say go for it !
Like John Dobson said, if it fits into your back garden then its too small, if you cant lift it then its too big.
You'll definitely see more in a 10" scope, with objects such as globular clusters you will so the most differance, they will go from been fuzzy blobs to been someway resolved into stars on the most part, and objects like the orion nebula will appear brighter and more detailed. I say go for it !
Like John Dobson said, if it fits into your back garden then its too small, if you cant lift it then its too big.
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
16 years 9 months ago #60977
by Seanie_Morris
Now that I've never heard before, but I like his advice!
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: Moving On
Like John Dobson said, if it fits into your back garden then its too small, if you cant lift it then its too big.
Now that I've never heard before, but I like his advice!
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paulevans
- Visitor
16 years 9 months ago #60981
by paulevans
Replied by paulevans on topic Re: Moving On
I bought a 10" Dob in September - the weather has been mostly dire since but I have seen a few things through it. Compared to my 6" LXD75 Newtonian the biggest difference was M42 which looks like a not terribly well defined fuzzy patch in the 6" but shows real structure in the 10" - a dramatic difference!
There would be much less difference with planets etc where magnification is more of a factor than sheer light gathering ability.
There would be much less difference with planets etc where magnification is more of a factor than sheer light gathering ability.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gnason
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 366
- Thank you received: 7
16 years 9 months ago #61047
by gnason
Short answer is yes if portability and weight are not issues. A jump of 4 inches in aperture is probably the recommended minimum one considering the cost and benefits of any upgrade although strangely going from 8 inches to 10 inches is a very noticeable jump (and going the other direction as I noticed when moving down from a 10 inch SCT to an 8 inch SCT).
The extra resolving power of the 10 inch will be very noticeable. Its ability to reveal vast numbers of stars in globulars, which through the 6 inch, were unresolved blobs or blobs with just peripheral stars resolved. The large open clusters will suddenly reveal dozens more stars and patterns than formerly seen. Nebulae will appear brighter, perhaps larger, more defined shape etc. Previously unseen galaxies will be observed while others will appear brighter and with more defined shape. If you enjoy double star observing then you can split closer doubles and detect component star colours better. The list of benefits goes on and on.
Unfortunately I had to go down in aperture because the weight of my Meade 10 inch SCT was just too much and it started to languish in its box. For me the 8 inch is fine in terms of aperture combined with weight.
Replied by gnason on topic Re: Moving On
I currently own a 6'' SCT on a cg-5 mount and for some reason I fell for a 10'' Newt on the same mount. What I like to know is would jumping from a 6'' sct to a 10'' newt make a good choice??
Short answer is yes if portability and weight are not issues. A jump of 4 inches in aperture is probably the recommended minimum one considering the cost and benefits of any upgrade although strangely going from 8 inches to 10 inches is a very noticeable jump (and going the other direction as I noticed when moving down from a 10 inch SCT to an 8 inch SCT).
The extra resolving power of the 10 inch will be very noticeable. Its ability to reveal vast numbers of stars in globulars, which through the 6 inch, were unresolved blobs or blobs with just peripheral stars resolved. The large open clusters will suddenly reveal dozens more stars and patterns than formerly seen. Nebulae will appear brighter, perhaps larger, more defined shape etc. Previously unseen galaxies will be observed while others will appear brighter and with more defined shape. If you enjoy double star observing then you can split closer doubles and detect component star colours better. The list of benefits goes on and on.
Unfortunately I had to go down in aperture because the weight of my Meade 10 inch SCT was just too much and it started to languish in its box. For me the 8 inch is fine in terms of aperture combined with weight.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.105 seconds