- Posts: 2267
- Thank you received: 7
APO Refractors
- ayiomamitis
- Offline
- Super Giant
Yes, this is correct. My Takahashi FSQ is a quadruplet (four elements) whereas my AP160 is a triplet (three elements).I thought that a doublet only used two pieces of glass in the lens, but a triplet uses 3 pieces of glass, each with different properties to correct for color and other aberration's. this is why triplets are so much heavier, due to the massive weight of all the glass used in the lens. is this not correct?
Anyway, APO refractors are incredible instruments and I make this statement on the basis of my experience with both an AP160 and Tak FSQ.
By the way, the "ED" refers to extra-low dispersion glass.
Anthony Ayiomamitis
Athens, Greece
www.perseus.gr
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Keith g
- Offline
- Super Giant
- Posts: 2682
- Thank you received: 549
I too am looking for an APO or close enough to piggyback on the CGE, for wider field shots, would you recommend the Megrez 90? A Vixen 103 also came into the equation
Steve, I suppose it all depends on wha you want, regarding price, focal length (depending on how good your mount will track) and aperture, the megrez 90 is very popular, but there are some great choices out there today, Vixen, Takahashi, Williams optics to name but a few reputable brands.
Doublet/triplet refers to either 2 or 3 baffles inside the scope to dampen internal reflection, 3 is better
Fintan, I just had a brain fart there :oops: what was I thinking, of course you are right, it's just these damn bright nights
Yours dreaming on.........
Keith..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Matthew C
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Red Giant
- Posts: 593
- Thank you received: 0
However im still undecided about the mount! Well suck it and see i suppose.
If any one has any alternative scopes or setups id love to hear your ideas!
Many thanks again guys!
We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time. . . .
T. S. Eliot
A wise man....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TrevorDurity
- Offline
- Red Giant
- Posts: 777
- Thank you received: 18
Both are APOs, both are air spaced doublets. I think the 66 uses fpl51 which doesn't give the same correction that fpl53 can + the 72 is a Megrez which is a step up in mechanical quality than the Zenithstar series (the 66 is a zs). That said if you are bang on focus I doubt the glass will make much of a difference.
BTW I believe one of the reasons that triplets are so favourable is that they can give inherently flatter fields straight from the bat - so maybe no need for a flattener? Could be wrong though.
The ED scopes usually have a single ED element so they are not as corrected as true APOs. "True APO" is becoming a bit of a hot debate now though, e.g. my Megrez90 is good but it couldn't compete optically with a Tak or AP of the same aperture methinks
Trev
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Matthew C
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Red Giant
- Posts: 593
- Thank you received: 0
IM getting confused!
Anywho im fairly sold on the megrez 72 and at 370€ its a steal! Now to win the lottery.....
I might have the money saved up soon!
We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time. . . .
T. S. Eliot
A wise man....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mikkelbo
- Offline
- Proto Star
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Specifically, I'm looking at these:
William Optics Megrez 72mm
William Optics 80mm
Orion EON 72mm ED APO
Apochromatic Refractor 80mm OTA (FPL53 glass)
I'm very tempted to go with the WO 72.
Keep the comments and recommendations coming
Mikkel Bo Rasmussen
SAC
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.