planetary eyepieces
- dave_lillis
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
15 years 2 months ago - 15 years 2 months ago #81153
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
planetary eyepieces was created by dave_lillis
Hi all,
For those who might have one, what do people think of TMB eyepeices for planetary viewing? or what would you consdier to be the best planetary eyepiece ??
I came across an orthoscope a few months back and the planetary views through it were notiably good, anyone else seen similar examples?
For those who might have one, what do people think of TMB eyepeices for planetary viewing? or what would you consdier to be the best planetary eyepiece ??
I came across an orthoscope a few months back and the planetary views through it were notiably good, anyone else seen similar examples?
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Last edit: 15 years 2 months ago by dave_lillis.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Graham
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 247
- Thank you received: 32
15 years 2 months ago #81159
by Graham
Replied by Graham on topic Re:planetary eyepieces
(is there a difference between eyepieces? I taught it was just quality of the lens... are there specific eyepieces for different objects assuming the quality of the make is the same?)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
15 years 2 months ago #81165
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re:planetary eyepieces
Well,
Some say that for planetary viewing that you're better off with less lenses in the eyepieces and that some designs perform better then others on the planets. On the other end of the scale, there are some widefield eyepeices that just will not work properly in a fast scope, but thats not what I'm talking about here.
I remember using the clubs 18mm orthscopic eyepiece on Saturn and comparing it to a standard plossl and the ortho gave a visibly sharper image, no question about it!
Some say that the high magnificatio (5-9mm) type 6 naglers could have problems given the 7 lens design, more lenses can reduce contrast, I've even heard someone say that these lenses have chromatic abberation around planets edges while others say they're very good.
I have used them regularily and found them to be excellent with no such defects, BUT I'm not one for letting it go at that,I'd love to give the eyepeice a run for its money against to likes of a TMB of similar power, always searching for that niche eyepiece.
I do find the 9mm and 7mm give good sharp star points but do find the 5mm gives slightly fuzzy star points, I'm wondering is it the seeing given that this is a magnification of 500x, only a shoot out with another 5mm eyepeice will tell.
Some say that for planetary viewing that you're better off with less lenses in the eyepieces and that some designs perform better then others on the planets. On the other end of the scale, there are some widefield eyepeices that just will not work properly in a fast scope, but thats not what I'm talking about here.
I remember using the clubs 18mm orthscopic eyepiece on Saturn and comparing it to a standard plossl and the ortho gave a visibly sharper image, no question about it!
Some say that the high magnificatio (5-9mm) type 6 naglers could have problems given the 7 lens design, more lenses can reduce contrast, I've even heard someone say that these lenses have chromatic abberation around planets edges while others say they're very good.
I have used them regularily and found them to be excellent with no such defects, BUT I'm not one for letting it go at that,I'd love to give the eyepeice a run for its money against to likes of a TMB of similar power, always searching for that niche eyepiece.
I do find the 9mm and 7mm give good sharp star points but do find the 5mm gives slightly fuzzy star points, I'm wondering is it the seeing given that this is a magnification of 500x, only a shoot out with another 5mm eyepeice will tell.
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NeilP
- Offline
- Proto Star
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 2 months ago #81171
by NeilP
Replied by NeilP on topic Re:planetary eyepieces
Dave
I have a few of the original TMB supermono planetary eyepieces and they would always be my eyepiece of choice on planets. They are really sharp and, I think, noticeably better than my naglers but they are not much good on anything else except maybe globs, they only have 30 degree AFOV
I have a few of the original TMB supermono planetary eyepieces and they would always be my eyepiece of choice on planets. They are really sharp and, I think, noticeably better than my naglers but they are not much good on anything else except maybe globs, they only have 30 degree AFOV
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
15 years 2 months ago #81176
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re:planetary eyepieces
Hi Neil,
Thanks for the reply, thats interesting about the TMB, so you definitely think they give a visibly better planetary image. what size one do you use ?
Thanks for the reply, thats interesting about the TMB, so you definitely think they give a visibly better planetary image. what size one do you use ?
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NeilP
- Offline
- Proto Star
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 2 months ago #81179
by NeilP
Replied by NeilP on topic Re:planetary eyepieces
Dave
Yes I think the image is definitely sharper, some observers in the states think the view is too sterile and cold through the supermonos but I do not mind it.
I have the 10, the 8 and the 4mms, though the 4 gets very little use it is quite hard to use.
I will have them at the Burren and you can give them a blast in the Obsessionator if you want.
Yes I think the image is definitely sharper, some observers in the states think the view is too sterile and cold through the supermonos but I do not mind it.
I have the 10, the 8 and the 4mms, though the 4 gets very little use it is quite hard to use.
I will have them at the Burren and you can give them a blast in the Obsessionator if you want.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.113 seconds