K-Tec

Maksutov telescopes

  • michaeloconnell
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
14 years 2 months ago #86065 by michaeloconnell
Maksutov telescopes was created by michaeloconnell
Just wondering how many people here have a maksutov telescope?
I came across this scope:
www.apm-telescopes.de/skymax-180-maksuto...a_proinfo_12690.html

180mm f/15. Focal length = 2700mm
Secondary obstruction is not too big either.
Should be very good planetary scope, in theory.
Anyone seen one?

Michael

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 years 2 months ago - 14 years 2 months ago #86069 by lunartic_old
Replied by lunartic_old on topic Re:Maksutov telescopes
I have an ETX 105, 1470mm FL, f/14 that provides some excellent views of the moon and sun, haven't tried it on the planets yet.

Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning.

Rich Cook
Last edit: 14 years 2 months ago by lunartic_old.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 years 2 months ago #86099 by jeyjey
Replied by jeyjey on topic Re:Maksutov telescopes
Hey, Michael.

I have an APM Mak-Cass, but it's one of their custom jobbies (based on Intes Micro optics), rather than a production model.

The 180 f/15 is probably a fine scope, but there's no substitute for aperture (even on the planets). My money's on your SCT wiping the floor with it.

If you're looking for something more portable, though, then it's certainly got appeal.

-- Jeff.

Nikon 18x70s / UA Millennium                              Colorado:
Solarscope SF70 / TV Pronto / AP400QMD             Coronado SolarMax40 DS / Bogen 055+3130
APM MC1610 / Tak FC-125 / AP1200GTO               Tak Mewlon 250 / AP600EGTO

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 years 2 months ago #86100 by dave_lillis
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re:Maksutov telescopes
well,
I got a f12 6" intes maksutov and find that the star images are extremely small, even for the brightest stars, however the image scale for the planets is considerably smaller then you'd find compared to a 12" SCT, now its been several years since Ive put these scopes up against each other and it would be interesting to do so again, to be honest I didnt have good seeing so it wasnt a good comparison.
As for maintainance the mak is MUCH hardet to collimate, but not impossible.

Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)

Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go. :)
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • michaeloconnell
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
14 years 2 months ago #86115 by michaeloconnell
Replied by michaeloconnell on topic Re:Maksutov telescopes
jeyjey wrote:

Hey, Michael.

I have an APM Mak-Cass, but it's one of their custom jobbies (based on Intes Micro optics), rather than a production model.

The 180 f/15 is probably a fine scope, but there's no substitute for aperture (even on the planets). My money's on your SCT wiping the floor with it.

If you're looking for something more portable, though, then it's certainly got appeal.

-- Jeff.


Hmm interesting. Would be great to do a back-to-back sometime.
Wouldn't hvave much need for a portable mak though, to be honest.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.106 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum