- Posts: 1954
- Thank you received: 976
4.8mm Nagler
- lunartic_old
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
12 years 2 months ago #95427
by lunartic_old
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning.
Rich Cook
4.8mm Nagler was created by lunartic_old
Hi all
I've been on the lookout for an eyepiece in the 5mm bracket, to help split tight doubles and wasn't sure what to for. I saw an ad on Cloudynights for a 4.8mm Nagler, type one, here's an image of the eyepiece:
www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/data/17...Tele_4-8mm-large.jpg
This is an older eyepiece, the seller was asking $100 and $10 to ship it, less than €90, I couldn't turn it down.
The seller has put it in the post and should be here in a week or so.
Looking forward to its arrival and I'll let you know how it performs.
Paul
I've been on the lookout for an eyepiece in the 5mm bracket, to help split tight doubles and wasn't sure what to for. I saw an ad on Cloudynights for a 4.8mm Nagler, type one, here's an image of the eyepiece:
www.cloudynights.com/classifieds/data/17...Tele_4-8mm-large.jpg
This is an older eyepiece, the seller was asking $100 and $10 to ship it, less than €90, I couldn't turn it down.
The seller has put it in the post and should be here in a week or so.
Looking forward to its arrival and I'll let you know how it performs.
Paul
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning.
Rich Cook
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Derek Davey
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 120
- Thank you received: 31
12 years 2 months ago #95433
by Derek Davey
Replied by Derek Davey on topic Re: 4.8mm Nagler
Good luck with it when it arrives, I bought a 9mm and 16mm Nagler a while ago, no regrets
bought them second hand also, hope it performs well for you
bought them second hand also, hope it performs well for you
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- lunartic_old
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 1954
- Thank you received: 976
12 years 2 months ago #95507
by lunartic_old
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning.
Rich Cook
Replied by lunartic_old on topic Re: 4.8mm Nagler
The eyepiece arrived this morning, tomorrow night I plan to be at the Sandymount observing session, the weather is promsing good, so it should get a workout.
Paul
Paul
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning.
Rich Cook
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- flt158
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 2535
- Thank you received: 2465
12 years 2 months ago #95509
by flt158
Replied by flt158 on topic Re: 4.8mm Nagler
Great stuff, Paul. Now blow us away with it. Liam Smyth issued me with a challenge recently. Split Almach (Gamma Andromedae)into 3 components. I haven't had a chance to try it yet with the 158mm APO. But then again, it might require a 3 mm Radian.
Aubrey.
Aubrey.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JohnONeill
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 612
- Thank you received: 138
12 years 2 months ago #95534
by JohnONeill
Replied by JohnONeill on topic Re: 4.8mm Nagler
Hi,
Aubrey, I have computed an ephemeris of Gamma Andromedae C (relative to :
Ephemeris of gamma C And
Date Sep. P.A.
" º
1980.000 0.56 107.9
1985.000 0.56 106.9
1990.000 0.55 105.8
1995.000 0.51 104.5
2000.000 0.44 103.1
2005.000 0.34 100.9
2010.000 0.18 95.7
2015.000 0.09 127.6
2020.000 0.28 115.5
2025.000 0.39 112.5
2030.000 0.47 110.7
2035.000 0.53 109.3
2040.000 0.56 108.2
[Mags: 5.3 6.1 Period: 61.1 yrs]
It would appear to very difficult object until another two decades or so. Good luck with it.
John
Aubrey, I have computed an ephemeris of Gamma Andromedae C (relative to :
Ephemeris of gamma C And
Date Sep. P.A.
" º
1980.000 0.56 107.9
1985.000 0.56 106.9
1990.000 0.55 105.8
1995.000 0.51 104.5
2000.000 0.44 103.1
2005.000 0.34 100.9
2010.000 0.18 95.7
2015.000 0.09 127.6
2020.000 0.28 115.5
2025.000 0.39 112.5
2030.000 0.47 110.7
2035.000 0.53 109.3
2040.000 0.56 108.2
[Mags: 5.3 6.1 Period: 61.1 yrs]
It would appear to very difficult object until another two decades or so. Good luck with it.
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- flt158
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 2535
- Thank you received: 2465
12 years 2 months ago #95538
by flt158
Replied by flt158 on topic Re: 4.8mm Nagler
Goodness me, John. They truly are closing is on one another.
Thank you for the information. I do seem to remember splitting B & C sometime back in the 1980's with 300X in a very new 6" reflector. But I am not sure about that. I wonder was it possible back then.
Aubrey.
Thank you for the information. I do seem to remember splitting B & C sometime back in the 1980's with 300X in a very new 6" reflector. But I am not sure about that. I wonder was it possible back then.
Aubrey.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.117 seconds