- Posts: 4173
- Thank you received: 181
which planetarium do people prefer?
- Visitor
21 years 6 months ago #138
by
I'l try and get my hands on a copy of that.
I mainly use Solaris
My linux box at home is debian (unstable branch) 2.4.20
Cheers,
~Al
Replied by on topic Re: xephem
albert,
just to le you know there is an article (i presume a review) in the july issue of linux magazine about this program which i will read with interest. i was wondering which version of linux you used to run it on?.
Stephen.
I'l try and get my hands on a copy of that.
I mainly use Solaris
My linux box at home is debian (unstable branch) 2.4.20
Cheers,
~Al
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- albertw
- Offline
- IFAS Secretary
Less
More
21 years 6 months ago #152
by albertw
Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/
Replied by albertw on topic Re: xephem
Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- finnjim2001
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 162
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 4 months ago #360
by finnjim2001
Somedays you're the dog,
Somedays you're the lamp post.
Replied by finnjim2001 on topic Re: which planetarium do people prefer?
Used Redshift 4 thought Redshit one was better. Since getting Starry night Backyard though I Havn't looked back
Somedays you're the dog,
Somedays you're the lamp post.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- johnflannery
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 1191
- Thank you received: 253
21 years 3 months ago #399
by johnflannery
Replied by johnflannery on topic software
hi Jim,
have both Redshift 3 and 4 though tend to not use them very much. Starry Night is quite nice for seeing how an event looks in the sky but for actual maps, etc. I've also got SkyMap Pro.
still, I've yet to see something beat the old Skyglobe DOS program. For speed, ease of use, small size on the disk, and much more, it's still right up there in my opinion with the best. Whenever I want to quickly step through a period of time to look at events I always turn to that first. It's a useful program time and time again.
I've also got Phil Harrington's Touring the Universe through Binoculars CD-ROM which is a star atlas with all the objects in the book of the same name labelled.
I'm intrigued too by the potential of some of the Pocket PC software for astronomy. I don't have one of the devices but they've got great potential into the future to have a detailed and dynamic sky atlas on screen along with maybe saved web pages on topics, etc. and something to record observations.
finally, a good old-fashioned planisphere beats any PC hands-down in terms of just being able to haul it out and dial in what's visible! No need to wait for your machine to boot up, etc.!
John
have both Redshift 3 and 4 though tend to not use them very much. Starry Night is quite nice for seeing how an event looks in the sky but for actual maps, etc. I've also got SkyMap Pro.
still, I've yet to see something beat the old Skyglobe DOS program. For speed, ease of use, small size on the disk, and much more, it's still right up there in my opinion with the best. Whenever I want to quickly step through a period of time to look at events I always turn to that first. It's a useful program time and time again.
I've also got Phil Harrington's Touring the Universe through Binoculars CD-ROM which is a star atlas with all the objects in the book of the same name labelled.
I'm intrigued too by the potential of some of the Pocket PC software for astronomy. I don't have one of the devices but they've got great potential into the future to have a detailed and dynamic sky atlas on screen along with maybe saved web pages on topics, etc. and something to record observations.
finally, a good old-fashioned planisphere beats any PC hands-down in terms of just being able to haul it out and dial in what's visible! No need to wait for your machine to boot up, etc.!
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- voyager
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 3663
- Thank you received: 2
21 years 3 months ago #402
by voyager
My Home Page - www.bartbusschots.ie
Replied by voyager on topic Re: which planetarium do people prefer?
I use my PDA quite a bit. I have a simple planetarium on it and I have avant go installed so I can download the nights details from heavens abouve before I leave the ofice.
They really are handy little devices.
Bart B.
They really are handy little devices.
Bart B.
My Home Page - www.bartbusschots.ie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
21 years 3 months ago #410
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: which planetarium do people prefer?
Good old planspheres, dew proof, drop proof and can stand the rigors of been left out over night by accident, unlike my laptop. :lol:
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.111 seconds