- Posts: 4557
- Thank you received: 76
Spot the difference
- dmcdona
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
18 years 6 months ago #28946
by dmcdona
Spot the difference was created by dmcdona
Folks - continuing on the improvement theme...
Enjoy!
Dave
1. M57 Planetary nebula - middle row. Before is left, update is right. Tell me what you think...
www.astroshack.net/gallery/nebulae/nebulae.php
2. M13 Globular Cluster - top row, two images to the right. Before is left, update is right. The difference here really surprised me - I certainly captured way more stars without burning out the core. But can you see what looks like coma towards the edges?
www.astroshack.net/gallery/clusters/clusters.php
Enjoy!
Dave
1. M57 Planetary nebula - middle row. Before is left, update is right. Tell me what you think...
www.astroshack.net/gallery/nebulae/nebulae.php
2. M13 Globular Cluster - top row, two images to the right. Before is left, update is right. The difference here really surprised me - I certainly captured way more stars without burning out the core. But can you see what looks like coma towards the edges?
www.astroshack.net/gallery/clusters/clusters.php
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
18 years 6 months ago #28952
by Seanie_Morris
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: Spot the difference
You know, on your Ring Nebula one, I prefer the one from last year! It has more stars in the field, and the nebulosity is not as, well, boosted! Your new one has less stars, but looks like the gain on the nebula is higher.
1st M57 for me, I'm afraid!
On the M13 one, there is a lot of vignetting in the field. You said top row, the 2 right images... both of these are dated 2005...
1st M57 for me, I'm afraid!
On the M13 one, there is a lot of vignetting in the field. You said top row, the 2 right images... both of these are dated 2005...
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ftodonoghue
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 991
- Thank you received: 7
18 years 6 months ago #28955
by ftodonoghue
Cheers
Trevor
Replied by ftodonoghue on topic Re: Spot the difference
I'D have to agree with Seanie on M57, Last years seems better.
As you say M13 on the right is way better, but the stars on the outside look as if they are in motion relative to the core, particularly on left side of image
As you say M13 on the right is way better, but the stars on the outside look as if they are in motion relative to the core, particularly on left side of image
Cheers
Trevor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dmcdona
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 4557
- Thank you received: 76
18 years 6 months ago #28958
by dmcdona
Replied by dmcdona on topic Re: Spot the difference
Seanie - glad it wasn't just me then!
I think my processing skills are still way off. As well as my typing (fixed the 2005 mistake - well spotted!)
The stars *are* in the second nebula but I concentrated on only bringing out detail in the nebula itself. This of course dimmed the starts to extinction. The litlle galaxy visible in the 1st image is also in the 2nd - but its extinguished as for the stars...
Trevor - the globular is giving me a bit of heartburn... I'm not sure that the issue is vignetting but TBH I think I've seen something that looks like vignetting on deep images I've taken before. Certainly the stars are consitently more eggy at the edge of the field - and I've not noticed that ever before Any optics experts out there?
Thanks for the coments lads. I'm off to compose a mail to Eirik - he can process them so they're perfect
Cheers
Dave
I think my processing skills are still way off. As well as my typing (fixed the 2005 mistake - well spotted!)
The stars *are* in the second nebula but I concentrated on only bringing out detail in the nebula itself. This of course dimmed the starts to extinction. The litlle galaxy visible in the 1st image is also in the 2nd - but its extinguished as for the stars...
Trevor - the globular is giving me a bit of heartburn... I'm not sure that the issue is vignetting but TBH I think I've seen something that looks like vignetting on deep images I've taken before. Certainly the stars are consitently more eggy at the edge of the field - and I've not noticed that ever before Any optics experts out there?
Thanks for the coments lads. I'm off to compose a mail to Eirik - he can process them so they're perfect
Cheers
Dave
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- voyager
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 3663
- Thank you received: 2
18 years 6 months ago #28960
by voyager
My Home Page - www.bartbusschots.ie
Replied by voyager on topic Re: Spot the difference
I'll also add my agreement that the old M57 is better but the new M13 kicks butt!
My Home Page - www.bartbusschots.ie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- albertw
- Offline
- IFAS Secretary
Less
More
- Posts: 4173
- Thank you received: 181
18 years 6 months ago #28966
by albertw
Yea, you are getting at lot worse at this imaging lark
Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/
Replied by albertw on topic Re: Spot the difference
You know, on your Ring Nebula one, I prefer the one from last year! It has more stars in the field, and the nebulosity is not as, well, boosted! Your new one has less stars, but looks like the gain on the nebula is higher.
1st M57 for me, I'm afraid!
Yea, you are getting at lot worse at this imaging lark
Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.113 seconds