- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
Autoguiding and Arcsec/pixel
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
18 years 3 weeks ago #36508
by michaeloconnell
Autoguiding and Arcsec/pixel was created by michaeloconnell
Say I have a refractor and autoguiding camera which combined would give an imaging scale of 2.3 arcsec/pixel.
Then, I have my SCT which, with the camera I want, would have an imaging scale of 1.65 arcsec/pixel.
In terms of autoguiding, does the guide camera and guide scope have a good enough imaging scale to autoguide the main scope and main camera? If not, what sort of relationship between imaging scales should I be aiming for?
Cheers,
Then, I have my SCT which, with the camera I want, would have an imaging scale of 1.65 arcsec/pixel.
In terms of autoguiding, does the guide camera and guide scope have a good enough imaging scale to autoguide the main scope and main camera? If not, what sort of relationship between imaging scales should I be aiming for?
Cheers,
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jed Glover
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 199
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 3 weeks ago #36521
by Jed Glover
Replied by Jed Glover on topic Re: Autoguiding and Arcsec/pixel
Hi Michael,
The conventional view is that the guide scope can be as little as 50% of the imaging scopes F/L and still get well tracked shots.
Dave Grennan was using at C9 1/4 prime focus guiding through a 600MM 80mm guide scope with no difficulty.
I don't think that image scale is that bigger deal other than using a scale that does not give scinterlation (sp?) a major role. Usually you could bin the guide camera if image scale is below 2 arc secs.
Later,
Jed.
The conventional view is that the guide scope can be as little as 50% of the imaging scopes F/L and still get well tracked shots.
Dave Grennan was using at C9 1/4 prime focus guiding through a 600MM 80mm guide scope with no difficulty.
I don't think that image scale is that bigger deal other than using a scale that does not give scinterlation (sp?) a major role. Usually you could bin the guide camera if image scale is below 2 arc secs.
Later,
Jed.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DaveGrennan
- Offline
- IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
Less
More
- Posts: 2707
- Thank you received: 32
18 years 3 weeks ago #36536
by DaveGrennan
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re: Autoguiding and Arcsec/pixel
Michael as Jed said, don't get too hung up on it. Most autoguiding software works to sub-pixel accuracy to a very high degree. Remember that you only have to keep within +-2" to ensure sharp round stars. This should be easily acheivable with your setup. Best idea is to suck it and see.
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eansbro
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 735
- Thank you received: 113
18 years 3 weeks ago #36540
by eansbro
Replied by eansbro on topic Re: Autoguiding and Arcsec/pixel
There is really no problem in guiding using a small scope as the Dave and Jed have mentioned. I am using a STV camera that is connected to a Nikon 300mm at f/2.8 camera lens (ie 12 inch focal length); guiding a large telescope with a focal length of 151 inches.
After using Pempro for feedback on PEC the tracking result is excellent. I have achieved 10 minute exposure with good results.
Hope this helps
Eamonn A
After using Pempro for feedback on PEC the tracking result is excellent. I have achieved 10 minute exposure with good results.
Hope this helps
Eamonn A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.125 seconds