K-Tec

Orion widefield

  • paulevans
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
17 years 11 months ago #39598 by paulevans
Orion widefield was created by paulevans
Hi guys,

Took this during the week. It's slightly artificial in that lots of LP has been stripped out of it by the creation and subtraction of an artificial dark frame, but what's good about is that the colours have survived the trip. Also, being a slightly hazy sky the brighter stars have bloomed a bit which adds to the effect!



Clear skies,

Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 11 months ago #39601 by Seanie_Morris
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: Orion widefield
You still got a very nice result there all the same Paul. Mind you, the stars Betelgeuse, Sirius, and Rigel, look somewhat inflated! Was this intentional, or a result of some of the processing? I'd say it has nothing to do with tracking, because all the stars in the FOV look fine.

What are the details of the image? Scope/camera, exposure times etc?

Seanie.

Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • paulevans
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
17 years 11 months ago #39603 by paulevans
Replied by paulevans on topic Re: Orion widefield
Thanks Seanie. The brighter stars have bloomed due to atmospeheric haze, of which there was a fair bit.

Camera was my trusty Minolta Dynax 5D, 24mm lens 15 sec @ f2.8, ISO 1600 - tripod mounted, no drive RAW mode processed with Adobe Camera RAW 3.5 and Photoshop Elements 3.

Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • DaveGrennan
  • Offline
  • IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
  • IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
More
17 years 11 months ago #39607 by DaveGrennan
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re: Orion widefield
Nice shot Paul. I'd say that creating the artifical subtraction frame is not necessarily the best way to go. Adjusting the histogram generally gives a more pleasing result Any chance you can post the unprocessed frame and I can show you what I mean?

Regards and Clear Skies,

Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • paulevans
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
17 years 11 months ago #39608 by paulevans
Replied by paulevans on topic Re: Orion widefield
That would be interesting Dave - I often do adjust things just by histogram but I've found this technique works really well too.

This is the jpeg out of the camera - the shot above was actually made from the RAW version of the same frame. Also the one above is slightly cropped - this is a straight 25% resize, but interested to see what can be done with it!



Clear skies,

Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • DaveGrennan
  • Offline
  • IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
  • IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
More
17 years 11 months ago #39609 by DaveGrennan
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re: Orion widefield
Paul,

Unfortunately the jpg compression means that processing this just results in the jpg artifacts showing up more. Any chance you could upload a copy of the uncompressed version it to your site and just post the link?? Even a bmp would be fine or a jpg with the compression set to a low level. You could even ZIP the bmp if uploading large files is an issue. I find 10% works well. I think there is a lot that can be done with this shot, but it can only be done with a better source file.

The other problem is the wispy cloud across the lower portion of the image but that can be sorted. Just makes it a little more difficult.

Here's all I can do with the highly compressed version.


[/img]

Regards and Clear Skies,

Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.120 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum