- Posts: 2707
- Thank you received: 32
M108 - Galaxy in Ursa Major
- DaveGrennan
- Topic Author
- Offline
- IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
Less
More
16 years 11 months ago #62662
by DaveGrennan
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re: M108 - Galaxy in Ursa Major
Eamonn,
I can rule out processing artifacts. Have a look at this
www.webtreatz.com/1frame.jpg
This is a section from one single frame. As I mentioned, I tried to identify something in the light path causing this. Perhaps a spider web thread. However I rotated the camera and found this anomaly recurring in exactly the same place with respect to the galaxy, i.e. it rotated with the galaxy.
I can rule out processing artifacts. Have a look at this
www.webtreatz.com/1frame.jpg
This is a section from one single frame. As I mentioned, I tried to identify something in the light path causing this. Perhaps a spider web thread. However I rotated the camera and found this anomaly recurring in exactly the same place with respect to the galaxy, i.e. it rotated with the galaxy.
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pj30something
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 1541
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 11 months ago #62679
by pj30something
Paul C
My next scope is going to be a Vixen VMC200L Catadioptric OTA
Replied by pj30something on topic Re: M108 - Galaxy in Ursa Major
Maybe a streak on the lens?
Paul C
My next scope is going to be a Vixen VMC200L Catadioptric OTA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- philiplardner
- Offline
- Red Giant
16 years 11 months ago #62691
by philiplardner
No - Every part of the lens contributes to every part of the image, so a localised smear on the lens will impart a slight blur to the overall image *unless* the smear is at the focal point of one element of the optical train. A smear on the CCD window might have this effect.
If it's rotating with the galaxy when the camera is rotated then the artifact is not in the camera so it must either be in another part of the optical train... or in the sky! Re-imaging with another camera will answer that one.
Phil.
Replied by philiplardner on topic Re: M108 - Galaxy in Ursa Major
Maybe a streak on the lens?
No - Every part of the lens contributes to every part of the image, so a localised smear on the lens will impart a slight blur to the overall image *unless* the smear is at the focal point of one element of the optical train. A smear on the CCD window might have this effect.
If it's rotating with the galaxy when the camera is rotated then the artifact is not in the camera so it must either be in another part of the optical train... or in the sky! Re-imaging with another camera will answer that one.
Phil.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- carlobeirnes
- Offline
- IFAS Sponsor & Astronomer of the Year 2013
Less
More
- Posts: 1424
- Thank you received: 147
16 years 11 months ago #62692
by carlobeirnes
Carl O’Beirnes,
Scopes and Space Ltd,
Unit A8 Airside Enterprise Centre,
Swords, Co Dublin,
Ireland.
www.scopesandspace.ie/
www.facebook.com/scopesandspace
twitter.com/ScopesandSpace
www.youtube.com/user/ScopesandSpace
Replied by carlobeirnes on topic Re: M108 - Galaxy in Ursa Major
Very nice Mate some great detail and a load of galexies in there to.
Carl O’Beirnes,
Scopes and Space Ltd,
Unit A8 Airside Enterprise Centre,
Swords, Co Dublin,
Ireland.
www.scopesandspace.ie/
www.facebook.com/scopesandspace
twitter.com/ScopesandSpace
www.youtube.com/user/ScopesandSpace
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eansbro
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 735
- Thank you received: 113
16 years 10 months ago #62718
by eansbro
Replied by eansbro on topic Re: M108 - Galaxy in Ursa Major
Dave and Phil,
Some interesting observations re the 'galaxy's tangential streak'. Let us know when you have diagnosed the problem.
Eamonn A
Some interesting observations re the 'galaxy's tangential streak'. Let us know when you have diagnosed the problem.
Eamonn A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- philiplardner
- Offline
- Red Giant
16 years 10 months ago #62734
by philiplardner
Correction - Reimaging with the same camera in a different telescope will answer this question (whether the streak is in the telescope optical train (excluding the camera) or in the sky!)
Phil.
Replied by philiplardner on topic Re: M108 - Galaxy in Ursa Major
If it's rotating with the galaxy when the camera is rotated then the artifact is not in the camera so it must either be in another part of the optical train... or in the sky! Re-imaging with another camera will answer that one.
Phil.
Correction - Reimaging with the same camera in a different telescope will answer this question (whether the streak is in the telescope optical train (excluding the camera) or in the sky!)
Phil.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.109 seconds