- Posts: 6334
- Thank you received: 315
test exposures with Alt-az tripod
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
100mm focal length; f/4.5; 4sec exposure; ISO200
www.astroshot.com/Wide%20Angle/Test%20Im...4.5-4secs-iso200.jpg
100mm focal length; f/4.5; 6sec exposure; ISO200
www.astroshot.com/Wide%20Angle/Test%20Im...4.5-6secs-iso200.jpg
400mm focal length; f/5.6; 4sec exposure; ISO200
www.astroshot.com/Wide%20Angle/Test%20Im...5.6-4secs-iso200.jpg
400mm focal length; f/5.6; 4sec exposure; ISO200
www.astroshot.com/Wide%20Angle/Test%20Im...5.6-4secs-iso200.jpg
400mm focal length; f/5.6; 6sec exposure; ISO200
www.astroshot.com/Wide%20Angle/Test%20Im...5.6-6secs-iso200.jpg
250mm focal length; f/5; 6sec exposure; ISO200
www.astroshot.com/Wide%20Angle/Test%20Im...-f5-6secs-iso200.jpg
250mm focal length; f/5; 10sec exposure; ISO200
www.astroshot.com/Wide%20Angle/Test%20Im...f5-10secs-iso200.jpg
100mm focal length; f/4.5; 10sec exposure; ISO200
www.astroshot.com/Wide%20Angle/Test%20Im....5-10secs-iso200.jpg
Lessons learnt? Exposures are limited to about 2-3 secs when in alt-az mode; ISO200 and RAW help keep the images really noise-free and I need to take more test exposures.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pj30something
- Offline
- Super Giant
- Posts: 1541
- Thank you received: 0
Actually now i look AGAIN...............No.5 onwards seem to lose detail. Lots more blurriness in them. So stick to the settings of the 1st four.
Paul C
My next scope is going to be a Vixen VMC200L Catadioptric OTA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Keith g
- Offline
- Super Giant
- Posts: 2682
- Thank you received: 549
So with alt-az, it's all about capturing the most amount of light in the least amount of time. don't worry so much about ISO as 3-5 seconds at ISO 800 upwards is not really going to be a big probem unless it is really warm outside, or your camera is warm from inside your house.
Set the aperture f stop as wide as you can, and step down if your subject is too bright, mainly this will be the moon, because anything else will only benefit in general from more light gathering power.
Also, is it a zoom lens you are using, if so, the higher the focal lenghth, the less the maximun f stop you will be able to use.
I think you are getting through the pain barrier (I learned with film !!!! :evil: ) and these tests will hold you in good stead.
Keith..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
- Posts: 6334
- Thank you received: 315
I'm mainly trying these exposures with the solar eclipse in Russia in mind. I'm hoping to just use a standard alt-az tripod rather than bringing a mount with me. The test has been useful to see the extent of diurnal motion in short exposures at these focal lengths.
Next time, I'll limit my exposures to less than 2secs and try ISO400 for comparison.
Cheers,
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
Of course the difference here is that I'm using a F5 4" aperture.
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frank Ryan
- Offline
- Super Giant
- Posts: 3298
- Thank you received: 57
Keith g wrote:
I think you are getting through the pain barrier (I learned with film !!!! :evil: ) /quote]
:shock:
Good grief!
I did photography in art college for a few months and boy did
we waste a shed load of film!
(all a learning curve though)
With digital, you can learn so much faster.
Mike,
Thanks for posting this up.
It makes for a great test card for the different settings.
My Astrophotography
Shannonside Astronomy Club __________________________________________
Meade ETX-125PE, Bresser 10 x 50 Binos & Me Peepers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.