- Posts: 1424
- Thank you received: 147
M42 feb 2010
- carlobeirnes
- Offline
- IFAS Sponsor & Astronomer of the Year 2013
Less
More
14 years 10 months ago #83766
by carlobeirnes
Carl O’Beirnes,
Scopes and Space Ltd,
Unit A8 Airside Enterprise Centre,
Swords, Co Dublin,
Ireland.
www.scopesandspace.ie/
www.facebook.com/scopesandspace
twitter.com/ScopesandSpace
www.youtube.com/user/ScopesandSpace
Replied by carlobeirnes on topic Re:M42 feb 2010
Very nice Frank nothing I can add to what the lads have all ready said well done.
Carl.
Carl.
Carl O’Beirnes,
Scopes and Space Ltd,
Unit A8 Airside Enterprise Centre,
Swords, Co Dublin,
Ireland.
www.scopesandspace.ie/
www.facebook.com/scopesandspace
twitter.com/ScopesandSpace
www.youtube.com/user/ScopesandSpace
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frank Ryan
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 3298
- Thank you received: 57
14 years 10 months ago - 14 years 10 months ago #83769
by Frank Ryan
My Astrophotography
Shannonside Astronomy Club __________________________________________
Meade ETX-125PE, Bresser 10 x 50 Binos & Me Peepers
Replied by Frank Ryan on topic Re:M42 feb 2010
Cheers for the info lads.
I'll defo do as ye suggest.
One thing...
maybe it's a big no no but I think it's made
my images look better....
When you talk about 'noise'
I basically 'erase' any hot / cold pixels in PS
coz I work in JPG.
THEN,
I find sometimes (with some shots) that if you create
a second layer and Gaus. blur it, say about 25-30%
then mix the origional and the blurred one together,
it makes for that 'Milky' look you say.
Just a tip.
I found by mesing around with some shots...
I'll defo do as ye suggest.
One thing...
maybe it's a big no no but I think it's made
my images look better....
When you talk about 'noise'
I basically 'erase' any hot / cold pixels in PS
coz I work in JPG.
THEN,
I find sometimes (with some shots) that if you create
a second layer and Gaus. blur it, say about 25-30%
then mix the origional and the blurred one together,
it makes for that 'Milky' look you say.
Just a tip.
I found by mesing around with some shots...
My Astrophotography
Shannonside Astronomy Club __________________________________________
Meade ETX-125PE, Bresser 10 x 50 Binos & Me Peepers
Last edit: 14 years 10 months ago by Frank Ryan.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DaveGrennan
- Offline
- IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
Less
More
- Posts: 2707
- Thank you received: 32
14 years 10 months ago #83771
by DaveGrennan
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re:M42 feb 2010
Hi Frank,
Your technique is one which will always make the final image look a lot better. It's not just about making the image smoother, although that will also be the end result too of upping the signal/noise ratio. The real benefit of getting a lot more exposures is it will greatly increase the detail in your image. This also becomes a lot more important with DSLR's since they don;t have cooling to reduce the noise in the individual subframes.
Your technique is one which will always make the final image look a lot better. It's not just about making the image smoother, although that will also be the end result too of upping the signal/noise ratio. The real benefit of getting a lot more exposures is it will greatly increase the detail in your image. This also becomes a lot more important with DSLR's since they don;t have cooling to reduce the noise in the individual subframes.
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.114 seconds