- Posts: 1321
- Thank you received: 250
Who says dobs are no good for astrophotography
- johnomahony
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
13 years 9 months ago - 13 years 9 months ago #88364
by johnomahony
The Lord giveth, the Revenue taketh away. (John 1:16)
www.flickr.com/photos/7703127@N07/
Who says dobs are no good for astrophotography was created by johnomahony
Hi
Have a look at the photos in the link below. They were taken by Alex Cherney (who is in my local club) using an SDM 22" dob with a servocat and a Sony mirrorless camera.
Pretty awesome for 8-15 second exposures. Aperture rules here.
www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=71913
Dave L, you should give this a go sometime, its the same setup as your 20"
Have a look at the photos in the link below. They were taken by Alex Cherney (who is in my local club) using an SDM 22" dob with a servocat and a Sony mirrorless camera.
Pretty awesome for 8-15 second exposures. Aperture rules here.
www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=71913
Dave L, you should give this a go sometime, its the same setup as your 20"
The Lord giveth, the Revenue taketh away. (John 1:16)
www.flickr.com/photos/7703127@N07/
Last edit: 13 years 9 months ago by johnomahony.
The following user(s) said Thank You: peterako
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mykc
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 460
- Thank you received: 197
13 years 9 months ago #88366
by mykc
Skywatcher 120 mm ED on a CG5 mount.
Orion UK 300mm Dobsonian
Replied by mykc on topic Re: Who says dobs are no good for astrophotography
Those photos are absolutely amazing for the very short exposures involved - Orion nebula in 9 x 8 sec!!!
They definitely fall into the category of "things that make you go Hmmm"! I guess a 22" f/3.6 scope is neither cheap, nor low maintenance, but the possibilities are awesome. I fear that you may have infected these boards with a new variant of the aperture fever virus.
They definitely fall into the category of "things that make you go Hmmm"! I guess a 22" f/3.6 scope is neither cheap, nor low maintenance, but the possibilities are awesome. I fear that you may have infected these boards with a new variant of the aperture fever virus.
Skywatcher 120 mm ED on a CG5 mount.
Orion UK 300mm Dobsonian
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
13 years 9 months ago #88371
by Seanie_Morris
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: Who says dobs are no good for astrophotography
Wow, those are awesome images for such short exposures... talk about aperture fever settling in again! :scope:
Seanie.
Seanie.
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
13 years 9 months ago #88382
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: Who says dobs are no good for astrophotography
well John,
It has crossed my mind and is one of the things I'm going to try with the 300D in the not too distant future when I set up a way of having the camera up there.
The shots are spectacular, especially more so given the exposure times, the views through the 20" on alot of the objects are photographic and seeing the horsehead has almost become routine.
If only we had an omega centauri up here
It has crossed my mind and is one of the things I'm going to try with the 300D in the not too distant future when I set up a way of having the camera up there.
The shots are spectacular, especially more so given the exposure times, the views through the 20" on alot of the objects are photographic and seeing the horsehead has almost become routine.
If only we had an omega centauri up here
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frank Ryan
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 3298
- Thank you received: 57
13 years 9 months ago #88385
by Frank Ryan
My Astrophotography
Shannonside Astronomy Club __________________________________________
Meade ETX-125PE, Bresser 10 x 50 Binos & Me Peepers
Replied by Frank Ryan on topic Re: Who says dobs are no good for astrophotography
Very nice shots.
I can't speak for large dob owners but
if I owned one I'd give imaging like this a
try just out of curiosity but when you get
almost photographic views
at the eyepiece you'd more than likely
prefer your eye on the eyepiece
insted of a camera.
I can't speak for large dob owners but
if I owned one I'd give imaging like this a
try just out of curiosity but when you get
almost photographic views
at the eyepiece you'd more than likely
prefer your eye on the eyepiece
insted of a camera.
My Astrophotography
Shannonside Astronomy Club __________________________________________
Meade ETX-125PE, Bresser 10 x 50 Binos & Me Peepers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- johnomahony
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 1321
- Thank you received: 250
13 years 9 months ago #88389
by johnomahony
The Lord giveth, the Revenue taketh away. (John 1:16)
www.flickr.com/photos/7703127@N07/
Replied by johnomahony on topic Re: Who says dobs are no good for astrophotography
Having looked through a 22" F3.6 Dob I tend to agree. I was impressed by the Sony Nex-5 camera though. Not expensive either.
Frank_Ryan_jr wrote: Very nice shots.
I can't speak for large dob owners but
if I owned one I'd give imaging like this a
try just out of curiosity but when you get
almost photographic views
at the eyepiece you'd more than likely
prefer your eye on the eyepiece
insted of a camera.
The Lord giveth, the Revenue taketh away. (John 1:16)
www.flickr.com/photos/7703127@N07/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.135 seconds