- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
Blue Moon
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Keenan
- Offline
- Proto Star
-
17 years 9 months ago #38814
by Keenan
Surely for a nation who can consider a burger "Awesome" nothing can actually be wrong?
Replied by Keenan on topic Re: Blue Moon
... - does that make Space.com wrong (May 2006)?
Not for American observers... as far as I can decipher.
Surely for a nation who can consider a burger "Awesome" nothing can actually be wrong?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dmcdona
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- albertw
- Offline
- IFAS Secretary
-
17 years 9 months ago #38829
by albertw
From the S&T article mentioned earlier.
According to that there was no blue moon (of any definition!) in 2006
Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/
Replied by albertw on topic Re: Blue Moon
From the S&T article mentioned earlier.
According to that there was no blue moon (of any definition!) in 2006
Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Silversurfer
- Offline
- Proto Star
-
- dmcdona
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
-
17 years 9 months ago #38856
by dmcdona
Replied by dmcdona on topic Re: Blue Moon
:oops:
Yes of course - I meant this year...
Thanks Martin
But its odd that S&T have June but Space.com list it as May... Judging by S&T's research into the definition of a Blue Moon I'd say theirs is the correct date.
Cheers
Dave
Yes of course - I meant this year...
Thanks Martin
But its odd that S&T have June but Space.com list it as May... Judging by S&T's research into the definition of a Blue Moon I'd say theirs is the correct date.
Cheers
Dave
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.131 seconds
  