- Posts: 2707
- Thank you received: 32
Vixen Great Polaris
- DaveGrennan
- Offline
- IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
Less
More
17 years 6 months ago #45564
by DaveGrennan
You shouldn't have to Paul. The OTA should have pre-drilled holes to accept the dovetail bars.
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re: Vixen Great Polaris
Again, thanks Dave.
I would be a bit nervous about drilling holes in my scope tube though.
Paul
You shouldn't have to Paul. The OTA should have pre-drilled holes to accept the dovetail bars.
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DaveGrennan
- Offline
- IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
Less
More
- Posts: 2707
- Thank you received: 32
17 years 6 months ago #45651
by DaveGrennan
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re: Vixen Great Polaris
Paul, I just saw Ian King has an offer on these mounts. Maybe this is what you were looking at anyway?
See here;
www.iankingimaging.com/show_products.php?category=99
See here;
www.iankingimaging.com/show_products.php?category=99
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- lunartic_old
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 1954
- Thank you received: 976
17 years 6 months ago #45871
by lunartic_old
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning.
Rich Cook
Replied by lunartic_old on topic Re: Vixen Great Polaris
Hi all
Unfortunately the Vixen is now unavailable.
I have searched the net and narrowed my choice down to two, you think after all this time it would be easier :roll: . All I have used in the past twenty years were dobs or smaller refractors on photographic tripods. The two I have my eye on are:
The Celestron CG-5 GoTo mount.
The Skywatcher HEQ5 with dual axis drive.
Now, I'm not into photography as I am a visual observer and I plan to mount an 8" SCT on it.
Both mounts have their pros and cons.
The legs on the CG-5 are 2" diameter as opposed to the HEQ5s 1.5".
The HEQ5 is a beefier mount and can take more weight.
The CG-5 has the GoTo system.
The HEQ5 has a built in polar alignment scope.
I am leaning towards the Skywatcher at the moment, mostly due to the fact that it can take more weight, a future scope I have in mind is a 6" refractor.
I would welcome any input anyone can give me so that I can make a final decision.
Yours truly.
Confused
Paul
Unfortunately the Vixen is now unavailable.
I have searched the net and narrowed my choice down to two, you think after all this time it would be easier :roll: . All I have used in the past twenty years were dobs or smaller refractors on photographic tripods. The two I have my eye on are:
The Celestron CG-5 GoTo mount.
The Skywatcher HEQ5 with dual axis drive.
Now, I'm not into photography as I am a visual observer and I plan to mount an 8" SCT on it.
Both mounts have their pros and cons.
The legs on the CG-5 are 2" diameter as opposed to the HEQ5s 1.5".
The HEQ5 is a beefier mount and can take more weight.
The CG-5 has the GoTo system.
The HEQ5 has a built in polar alignment scope.
I am leaning towards the Skywatcher at the moment, mostly due to the fact that it can take more weight, a future scope I have in mind is a 6" refractor.
I would welcome any input anyone can give me so that I can make a final decision.
Yours truly.
Confused
Paul
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning.
Rich Cook
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.109 seconds