- Posts: 1541
- Thank you received: 0
600lb capacity mount
- pj30something
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
16 years 6 months ago #67372
by pj30something
Paul C
My next scope is going to be a Vixen VMC200L Catadioptric OTA
Replied by pj30something on topic Re: 600lb capacity mount
The Chronos HD45 harmonic drive telescope mount system has a weight capacity of 600 pounds, and will be custom-made for your observatory!
Who in the HELL would have a scope that weighs 600Lbs?
(I mean amateur astronomers.)
Good God i have enough trouble taking my 28Lb scope from my tv room out to the back garden.
With THIS mount (and the scope) i would need to apply for a HGV licence.
Who in the HELL would have a scope that weighs 600Lbs?
(I mean amateur astronomers.)
Good God i have enough trouble taking my 28Lb scope from my tv room out to the back garden.
With THIS mount (and the scope) i would need to apply for a HGV licence.
Paul C
My next scope is going to be a Vixen VMC200L Catadioptric OTA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
16 years 6 months ago #67400
by Seanie_Morris
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: 600lb capacity mount
I think 'relativity' plays a part PJ. Think of it like this: 15 years ago the best CCD camera us amateurs could buy had a resolution of 640 X 480 pixels and cost about $320. Today, we call it a webcam from PC World for €30.
The same can be said for mounts. When the LX series from Meade first came out in the mid-90's, it was very expensive. Today, very affordable (don't even get me started on the current exchange rate lending a hand). We now have more amateurs able to purchase larger mounts than in the past, so more advanced models are needed to replace obsolete pro versions now affordable to amateurs.
Did I explain that ok?
Seanie.
The same can be said for mounts. When the LX series from Meade first came out in the mid-90's, it was very expensive. Today, very affordable (don't even get me started on the current exchange rate lending a hand). We now have more amateurs able to purchase larger mounts than in the past, so more advanced models are needed to replace obsolete pro versions now affordable to amateurs.
Did I explain that ok?
Seanie.
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pj30something
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 1541
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 6 months ago #67436
by pj30something
Paul C
My next scope is going to be a Vixen VMC200L Catadioptric OTA
Replied by pj30something on topic Re: 600lb capacity mount
Yep fine Seanie. But.......i was more concerned about the weight of a scope that would need such a BIG mount.
Paul C
My next scope is going to be a Vixen VMC200L Catadioptric OTA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
16 years 6 months ago #67438
by Seanie_Morris
Well, that follows progression. What was affordable and/or used in observatories about 10 years ago is now in the hands of amateurs. Professional institutions can now buy larger/heavier scopes to suit their needs for their money. The benefit of a heavy scope - if it has a mount to suit - is the sturdiness, and hence lack of vibrational movement. It kind of dampens its own vibrations due to its huge weight.
You'd be surprised how heavy component parts can be for some of the larger mirror-based telescopes out there. A 30 inch mirror weighs about 260lbs - and that's without the tube assembly, focuser, piggyback items, and a Canon 350D!
Seanie.
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: 600lb capacity mount
Yep fine Seanie. But.......i was more concerned about the weight of a scope that would need such a BIG mount.
Well, that follows progression. What was affordable and/or used in observatories about 10 years ago is now in the hands of amateurs. Professional institutions can now buy larger/heavier scopes to suit their needs for their money. The benefit of a heavy scope - if it has a mount to suit - is the sturdiness, and hence lack of vibrational movement. It kind of dampens its own vibrations due to its huge weight.
You'd be surprised how heavy component parts can be for some of the larger mirror-based telescopes out there. A 30 inch mirror weighs about 260lbs - and that's without the tube assembly, focuser, piggyback items, and a Canon 350D!
Seanie.
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.119 seconds