First scope with other eye on future photos
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
13 years 2 weeks ago - 13 years 2 weeks ago #91168
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: First scope with other eye on future photos
you would need a serious mount to hold a 12" Dob ota, tbh its not a practical solution in terms of cost, youre better off have one setup for imaging and another for observing.
Observing needs big aperture.
Imaging need a good mount.
You can have the same setup for both but then you're really looking at a BIG sct\rc on an eq mount.
Observing needs big aperture.
Imaging need a good mount.
You can have the same setup for both but then you're really looking at a BIG sct\rc on an eq mount.
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Last edit: 13 years 2 weeks ago by dave_lillis.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dmcdona
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 4557
- Thank you received: 76
13 years 2 weeks ago #91179
by dmcdona
Replied by dmcdona on topic Re: First scope with other eye on future photos
If you have a large Dob, a sensitive imager and are taking images of bright objects, tracking may not be a major issue. Of course, you'll be limited to what you can image.
I think your plan of buying the dob first, getting your foot up the ladder of experience and learning the basics is a sound plan. I think you will be able to take *some* images with that setup - you can then decide if you have the astrophotography bug. If you do, God help you. If you don't, just keep on enjoying the Dob but DO NOT, I repeat DO NOT contact Dave Lillis and ask him for a view through his Dob. That will lead to terminal aperture fever.
Good plan though - stick with it and keep coming here for help/advice.
I think your plan of buying the dob first, getting your foot up the ladder of experience and learning the basics is a sound plan. I think you will be able to take *some* images with that setup - you can then decide if you have the astrophotography bug. If you do, God help you. If you don't, just keep on enjoying the Dob but DO NOT, I repeat DO NOT contact Dave Lillis and ask him for a view through his Dob. That will lead to terminal aperture fever.
Good plan though - stick with it and keep coming here for help/advice.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mjc
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 470
- Thank you received: 20
13 years 2 weeks ago #91181
by mjc
Replied by mjc on topic Re: First scope with other eye on future photos
I went 8" dobsonian and then remounted on an Eq6 Pro later on.
The only difference is that you have two plastic yokes that remain part of the OTA assembly and these can obstruct just how far up and down you can move the OTA when balancing along the dove-tail bar (eventually they collide with the tube rings). In practice it has not hindered me. I'm sure they're easy enogh to remove if I had to.
Mark C.
The only difference is that you have two plastic yokes that remain part of the OTA assembly and these can obstruct just how far up and down you can move the OTA when balancing along the dove-tail bar (eventually they collide with the tube rings). In practice it has not hindered me. I'm sure they're easy enogh to remove if I had to.
Mark C.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RandomPillars
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 224
- Thank you received: 95
13 years 2 weeks ago #91195
by RandomPillars
"... quit trying to upset and disturb Dr. Venkman..."
Replied by RandomPillars on topic Re: First scope with other eye on future photos
Wow, thanks for all the responses.
Seriously great help on these forums and I'm sure I'll be using this avenue quite a lot in the future. After all is said (and not done yet) I'll just go for the biggest aperture I can afford at the moment, and then worry about imaging if I get that seemingly very expensive bug later!
Thanks to everyone again.
Right, where can I get a 3 meter scope for €600 .....
Seriously great help on these forums and I'm sure I'll be using this avenue quite a lot in the future. After all is said (and not done yet) I'll just go for the biggest aperture I can afford at the moment, and then worry about imaging if I get that seemingly very expensive bug later!
Thanks to everyone again.
Right, where can I get a 3 meter scope for €600 .....
"... quit trying to upset and disturb Dr. Venkman..."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- johnomahony
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 1321
- Thank you received: 250
13 years 2 weeks ago #91213
by johnomahony
The Lord giveth, the Revenue taketh away. (John 1:16)
www.flickr.com/photos/7703127@N07/
Replied by johnomahony on topic Re: First scope with other eye on future photos
There is a range of GSO F4 Newtonians available at low cost. They're meant to be used as imaging scopes but are also visual scopes. May need a coma corrector though. You will need a mount. I do know people who mount 8 -10 inch GSO dobs onto eq mounts for imaging.
The Lord giveth, the Revenue taketh away. (John 1:16)
www.flickr.com/photos/7703127@N07/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RandomPillars
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 224
- Thank you received: 95
13 years 2 weeks ago #91219
by RandomPillars
"... quit trying to upset and disturb Dr. Venkman..."
Replied by RandomPillars on topic Re: First scope with other eye on future photos
Being new to this, I don't know what gso stands for but I'm going to look it up.
Thanks John
Thanks John
"... quit trying to upset and disturb Dr. Venkman..."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.118 seconds