K-Tec

Double cluster

More
18 years 9 months ago #18529 by martinastro
Replied by martinastro on topic Re: Double cluster
Im stuck for words :shock:

Martin Mc Kenna

coruscations attending the whole length of the luminosity, giving to the phenomena the aspect of a wrathful messenger, and not that of a tranquil body pursuing a harmless course..comet of 1680

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Jed Glover
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Main Sequence
  • Main Sequence
More
18 years 9 months ago #18546 by Jed Glover
Replied by Jed Glover on topic Re: Double cluster

Is the image cropped? If not, that's a nice (semi?) apo. I always fancied a Williams.

How did you combine the bias and dark frames? Median, average? I saw that many answers to that question that I gave up... :D

I just spotted your M45 too - nice. I like the 'nebulosity' that you captured. Is it officially nebulosity or something else? - I forget...

Hi Dave,

That is 60% reduced version (but that is full frame, I have not cropped it). The full resolution is really too big to post at 3456x2304. The Zenithstar 80 is a very nice scope for £299! The anti-fringe filter makes the williams hard to beat at the price.

I use ImagesPlus 2.5, it does all the hard work for me on caliberating ;)

On the M45, I need to go deeper to get more nebulosity, but I was very pleased at what I managed to get.

Later,

Jed

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 years 9 months ago #18547 by Seanie_Morris
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: Double cluster
"My God, its full of stars!"

Stunning, just absoutely stunning Jed!

Seanie.

Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 years 9 months ago #18611 by dmcdona
Replied by dmcdona on topic Re: Double cluster
Hmm - I thought you might have the Megrez. But for 299, that 80mm performs exceedingly well. Sharp to the edge. WO certainly seem to be building up their reputation.

I know what you mean about reducing the image with darks and bias frames - I do the same. I thought you might be doing by hand though.

Do you ever use flats? I have on one or two occasions but its a pain and I personally don't see the difference with my particular setup...

Cheers

Dave

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Jed Glover
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Main Sequence
  • Main Sequence
More
18 years 9 months ago #18631 by Jed Glover
Replied by Jed Glover on topic Re: Double cluster
Hi Dave,

Dave Grennan and I are considering building light boxes atm. They make a big differance where you have significant vignetting in the optical train.

So if I image through a Celestron F6.3 reducer ( I use the GEG now though! ) there is a significant porthole effect that a flat frame would reduce.

As you can see I have not got enough image depth on either of my two images so far to tell if the ZS80 has any vignetting.

I did look at the Megrez II ED but when I saw the images from the ZS80 on Ian Kings site I thought the Megrez was probably not worth the extra £100. So far I am very pleased with the ZS 80 :)

On the Zenithstar 80mm, it is hard to think of a scope that can currently compete on price. The only issue is that a minus violet (aka fringe filter) is advisable if you intend to do astrophotography. I got the baeder 2" one.

Useing ImagesPlus I put those two images together from 60+ frames each in about an hour. It is worth every penny I spent on it.

Later,

Jed.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Jed Glover
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Main Sequence
  • Main Sequence
More
18 years 9 months ago #18635 by Jed Glover
Replied by Jed Glover on topic Re: Double cluster
Thanks you all for the kind words!

Later,

Jed.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.134 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum