- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
What software (akin to Registax) is best to stack stills?
- paulevans
- Visitor
17 years 2 months ago #52524
by paulevans
Replied by paulevans on topic Re: What software (akin to Registax) is best to stack stills?
Just to add to that - yes, Deep Sky Stacker does work with jpegs, and yes, I've used Rot 'n' Stack with some good results and also some very "interesting" results - it's certainly worth a try!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
17 years 2 months ago #52525
by Seanie_Morris
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: What software (akin to Registax) is best to stack stills?
Wow, Deep Sky Stacker seems to get a majority vote from the few replies given. Those of you who have DSS, have you tried Registax as well? And if so, why give the vote to DSS? I know somethings are subjective e.g. an easier to ue CP, or features, but if the net result can still be the same, I am looking for the quirkes that make the suggested programme that little bit more advantageous.
Seanie.
Seanie.
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bertthebudgie
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 395
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 2 months ago #52575
by bertthebudgie
Eqipment
Lx90 8' SCT, UHC Narrowband filter
SPC900 Webcam, Atik 16ic
Astrozap Dew Heater
Meade eyepieces & barlows 9,26 and 32mm
Moonfish 32mm 2"
_______________________________________
"Always pass to the man in space"
Replied by bertthebudgie on topic Re: What software (akin to Registax) is best to stack stills?
Seanie
I use registax for planetary work and it is great for that. Registax does not derotate the images which makes it not a good choice for deepsky imaging.
A typical avi lasts 3 minutes only typically through a barlow lense whereas a deepsky imaging run could be hours long with a wide field or focal reducer. This means that the ability to derotate the images will be absolutely essential if you are imaging with a fork mount or in altaz for deep sky and not so important for planetary.
Of course if your perfectly polar alligned this will not be so important.
I guess it is just horses for courses really.
db
I use registax for planetary work and it is great for that. Registax does not derotate the images which makes it not a good choice for deepsky imaging.
A typical avi lasts 3 minutes only typically through a barlow lense whereas a deepsky imaging run could be hours long with a wide field or focal reducer. This means that the ability to derotate the images will be absolutely essential if you are imaging with a fork mount or in altaz for deep sky and not so important for planetary.
Of course if your perfectly polar alligned this will not be so important.
I guess it is just horses for courses really.
db
Eqipment
Lx90 8' SCT, UHC Narrowband filter
SPC900 Webcam, Atik 16ic
Astrozap Dew Heater
Meade eyepieces & barlows 9,26 and 32mm
Moonfish 32mm 2"
_______________________________________
"Always pass to the man in space"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.138 seconds