- Posts: 486
- Thank you received: 0
Venus again
- wellbuttie
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
15 years 10 months ago #76888
by wellbuttie
Steve Roche
.........
"Technology is a way of organising the universe so that man doesn't have to experience it."
steviestargazer.ivisionireland.com
www.deiseastronomy.com
photo.ivisionireland.com
Venus again was created by wellbuttie
Hi all,
Venus again, intersting to see the difference in size and phase over 13 days.. I needed, the best 750 out of 30,000 frames to capture on the 21st. Thankfully, I got something. I used a Continium filter on a cge 11 inch SCT. I hope to get a few more shots over the next few weeks (clouds allowing: blink: ), to compare the size and phase of the planet.
Taken from Waterford, Ireland
Best regards
Steve
Venus again, intersting to see the difference in size and phase over 13 days.. I needed, the best 750 out of 30,000 frames to capture on the 21st. Thankfully, I got something. I used a Continium filter on a cge 11 inch SCT. I hope to get a few more shots over the next few weeks (clouds allowing: blink: ), to compare the size and phase of the planet.
Taken from Waterford, Ireland
Best regards
Steve
Steve Roche
.........
"Technology is a way of organising the universe so that man doesn't have to experience it."
steviestargazer.ivisionireland.com
www.deiseastronomy.com
photo.ivisionireland.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- carlobeirnes
- Offline
- IFAS Sponsor & Astronomer of the Year 2013
Less
More
- Posts: 1424
- Thank you received: 147
15 years 10 months ago - 15 years 10 months ago #76889
by carlobeirnes
Carl O’Beirnes,
Scopes and Space Ltd,
Unit A8 Airside Enterprise Centre,
Swords, Co Dublin,
Ireland.
www.scopesandspace.ie/
www.facebook.com/scopesandspace
twitter.com/ScopesandSpace
www.youtube.com/user/ScopesandSpace
Replied by carlobeirnes on topic Re:Venus again
Hi Steve,
Those images are very nice indeed sharp as a pin processing is excellent. Venus is one hard planet to image because of the amount of shimmering it does on the screen. The size difference is incredable in just two weeks.
Well-done mate.
Carl.
Those images are very nice indeed sharp as a pin processing is excellent. Venus is one hard planet to image because of the amount of shimmering it does on the screen. The size difference is incredable in just two weeks.
Well-done mate.
Carl.
Carl O’Beirnes,
Scopes and Space Ltd,
Unit A8 Airside Enterprise Centre,
Swords, Co Dublin,
Ireland.
www.scopesandspace.ie/
www.facebook.com/scopesandspace
twitter.com/ScopesandSpace
www.youtube.com/user/ScopesandSpace
Last edit: 15 years 10 months ago by carlobeirnes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mjc
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 470
- Thank you received: 20
15 years 10 months ago #76890
by mjc
Replied by mjc on topic Re:Venus again
Very nice - a couple of questions - how many stacked frames is the typical ball park? 750 sounds quite large. Does S/N improve anything like significantly beyond a few tens of frames?
I've imaged venus a few weeks ago (okay with a Dob at that point) and only stacked about 20. (Your images are superior to mine BTW).
Second question - what's a Continium filter?
Mark
I've imaged venus a few weeks ago (okay with a Dob at that point) and only stacked about 20. (Your images are superior to mine BTW).
Second question - what's a Continium filter?
Mark
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
15 years 10 months ago #76897
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re:Venus again
Hi Steve,
A fine pair of images there, you should try running something like starrynight, this planet is going to get real big soon enough.
Do you use the filter to reduce the glare of the planet while imaging ?
A fine pair of images there, you should try running something like starrynight, this planet is going to get real big soon enough.
Do you use the filter to reduce the glare of the planet while imaging ?
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- michaeloconnell
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 6334
- Thank you received: 315
15 years 10 months ago #76898
by michaeloconnell
Replied by michaeloconnell on topic Re:Venus again
Very nice set of comparitive images Stephen!
Michael.
Michael.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wellbuttie
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 486
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 10 months ago #76899
by wellbuttie
Steve Roche
.........
"Technology is a way of organising the universe so that man doesn't have to experience it."
steviestargazer.ivisionireland.com
www.deiseastronomy.com
photo.ivisionireland.com
Replied by wellbuttie on topic Re:Venus again
Thanks folks
Carl, Venus is indeed one hard planet to image, it was jumping around the screen like an "out of focus" ping pong ball. Thanks for your comments, I hope to create a montage of the size and phase differences over the next few weeks.
Hi Mark, thanks again. In my own case, the amount of frames I select is based on the quality of the AVI's captured, and then some "Trial and Error". Generally it would be between 700 and 1000, however, this is down to experimentation, rather than using a scientific calculation (Nyquist theory). I generally would create a reference frame from the best 50 frames in registax, and then take it from there, depending on the quality of what was captured. In the Venus case, I found I had to capture alot of frames, due to athmosphere conditions and the low position of Venus itself, and try to weed out the best 750, which seemed to generate the best results, in this case. More experienced, planetary imagers on the site here, would be more qualified to advise you on the optimum methodologies. In my own case, there is still a big element of trial and error (but I enjoy the learning experience:silly: ).
A Continuum filter is actually a solar filter (to be used with an appropriate Full aperature Solar filter for Solar observing) that I use for sunspot observation/imaging (not much happening there though). I thought by using this on Venus it may help "Steady" the image a bit better, due to its narrow bandpass. I have just been experimenting with it, as I dont have a dedicated Venus filter at this point in time. Hopefully, I will purchase a dedicated Venus filter in the future, which may generate better results!
Hope this is of use.
Best regards
Steve
Carl, Venus is indeed one hard planet to image, it was jumping around the screen like an "out of focus" ping pong ball. Thanks for your comments, I hope to create a montage of the size and phase differences over the next few weeks.
Hi Mark, thanks again. In my own case, the amount of frames I select is based on the quality of the AVI's captured, and then some "Trial and Error". Generally it would be between 700 and 1000, however, this is down to experimentation, rather than using a scientific calculation (Nyquist theory). I generally would create a reference frame from the best 50 frames in registax, and then take it from there, depending on the quality of what was captured. In the Venus case, I found I had to capture alot of frames, due to athmosphere conditions and the low position of Venus itself, and try to weed out the best 750, which seemed to generate the best results, in this case. More experienced, planetary imagers on the site here, would be more qualified to advise you on the optimum methodologies. In my own case, there is still a big element of trial and error (but I enjoy the learning experience:silly: ).
A Continuum filter is actually a solar filter (to be used with an appropriate Full aperature Solar filter for Solar observing) that I use for sunspot observation/imaging (not much happening there though). I thought by using this on Venus it may help "Steady" the image a bit better, due to its narrow bandpass. I have just been experimenting with it, as I dont have a dedicated Venus filter at this point in time. Hopefully, I will purchase a dedicated Venus filter in the future, which may generate better results!
Hope this is of use.
Best regards
Steve
Steve Roche
.........
"Technology is a way of organising the universe so that man doesn't have to experience it."
steviestargazer.ivisionireland.com
www.deiseastronomy.com
photo.ivisionireland.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.118 seconds