K-Tec

Images in Signatures - we need your opinion

More
17 years 6 months ago #46540 by albertw

We (the Web Team) seem to be stuck as to whether or not to allow images or not, as it is a move that the committee as a whole will have to vote on once brought forward, but even some personal preferrences are clashing against each other. Without saying anymore on the preferrences themselves, it was suggested to see what the general user population (of these boards) thought about having images in signatures.


Lets just sort it out the usual way. If Seanie proposes or has X then X is outlawed :-) Seanie has a pic in his sig, therefore all images in sigs should be banned 8-)

Albert White MSc FRAS
Chairperson, International Dark Sky Association - Irish Section
www.darksky.ie/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 6 months ago #46550 by dave_lillis
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: Images in Signatures - we need your opinion
Thats the voice of reason Al :lol:

Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)

Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go. :)
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 6 months ago #46553 by ctr
How could any sane person censor the Simpsons :shock:

Each of us is here on earth for a reason, and each of us has a special mission to carry out - Maria Shriver

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 6 months ago #46554 by Matthew C
Replied by Matthew C on topic Re: Images in Signatures - we need your opinion
Youd be surprised! :shock:

We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time. . . .
T. S. Eliot
A wise man....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 6 months ago #46555 by Frank Ryan
Replied by Frank Ryan on topic Re: Images in Signatures - we need your opinion
I have to say I like the idea of avitars, sigs etc because it
makes it
a. easier to get a mental image of the people on these boards, and
b. i gives people a bit of artistic freedom to create a profile.

so yeah, let it off...
the only thing I'd say is,
sometimes really flash-ie sigs make it hard to read a page.

So maybe its ok to have 'active' avitars but static sigs?

Anyone?....

My Astrophotography
Shannonside Astronomy Club __________________________________________
Meade ETX-125PE, Bresser 10 x 50 Binos & Me Peepers

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 6 months ago #46558 by JohnMurphy
Replied by JohnMurphy on topic Re: Images in Signatures - we need your opinion
Well I guess Seanies in favour of images in sigs, though he does have some taste (love the avatar - and the sig is quite amusing). As long as size and content is monitored then I suppose it adds colour.

It is no different to the limitations in place regarding avatars, usernames, banned words, and so on.


Any chance of a list of those "banned" words - or are they verboten - how can we know whats forbidden unless we can check the list? This is the type of red tape, "jobs worth", world we enter into by going down this road. Catch22 how are you?
I reckon it should be left up to the mods. I've had a wrist slap or two for anti-social verbiage - fair enough - (maybe if I had a list of 'mots non salut' then I could have moderated myself), however, who wants to check a list which can't be disseminated because it's slightly blue (it might be corrupting and lead to "ideas" - may your god forbid).

Anyway - I say leave it to the mods to decide - they haven't done a bad job up to now!

Clear Skies,
John Murphy
Irish Astronomical Society
Check out My Photos

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.112 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum