K-Tec

Comparative study of M42

More
16 years 9 months ago #62291 by jeyjey
Comparative study of M42 was created by jeyjey
Here are three sketches of the same target, showing what might be expected at differing apertures, magnifications and filtrations:
  • 70mm, 18x, unfiltered
  • 406mm, 175x, unfiltered
  • 406mm, 510x, narrowband






Anyway, I thought some might find it interesting...

-- Jeff.

Nikon 18x70s / UA Millennium                              Colorado:
Solarscope SF70 / TV Pronto / AP400QMD             Coronado SolarMax40 DS / Bogen 055+3130
APM MC1610 / Tak FC-125 / AP1200GTO               Tak Mewlon 250 / AP600EGTO

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 9 months ago #62292 by donalmcnamara
Replied by donalmcnamara on topic Re: Comparative study of M42
Hi Jeff,
These along with yesterdays sketches are great for those that still sketch.
Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 9 months ago #62297 by dogstar
Replied by dogstar on topic Re: Comparative study of M42
Hey Jeff they are really something :shock: that art work is fab thanks for posting.What type of sketching materials do you use for that kind of thing, and do you use different materials for different objects ie:nebula,planets.

oh wise man why is the universe so perfect?ah because symmetry loves herself.

____________________________

11" sct,
various Apo refractors,
various cameras,
Losmandy mount.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 9 months ago #62305 by jeyjey
Replied by jeyjey on topic Re: Comparative study of M42
Donal --

Now that I've finally got my sketches up on a web server and can post them here, I've got 3 or 4 more back-logged observation reports that I'll dribble out over the next couple of weeks.

Dogstar --

I'm still a novice sketcher, so my kit is pretty basic. All my sketches are done in a Daler-Rowney A5 spiral-bound sketchbook (50 sheets of 160gm "cartridge" paper, which is nice and heavy and stands up to lots of smudging, erasing, and some good old-fashioned Irish humidity).

I've got a soft pencil (HB, perhaps), and a harder one (3H, I think), but I only use the harder one for globular clusters (see M15, below). A couple of blending stumps, a normal rubber and a gum rubber round out the kit. (The gum rubber is great for rolling over part of a sketch to dim it a bit.)

I then scan the sketches into Photoshop, clean up any scanner artifacts, and invert them.

I've seen some fantastic planetary sketches done with pastels and colored pencils, but I haven't progressed that far yet. (I only started October past; my portfolio currently stands at about 35 sketches.)

Cheers,
-- Jeff.


Nikon 18x70s / UA Millennium                              Colorado:
Solarscope SF70 / TV Pronto / AP400QMD             Coronado SolarMax40 DS / Bogen 055+3130
APM MC1610 / Tak FC-125 / AP1200GTO               Tak Mewlon 250 / AP600EGTO

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 9 months ago #62307 by dogstar
Replied by dogstar on topic Re: Comparative study of M42
Cool, that M15 is amazing.

oh wise man why is the universe so perfect?ah because symmetry loves herself.

____________________________

11" sct,
various Apo refractors,
various cameras,
Losmandy mount.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 9 months ago #62352 by dmolloy
Replied by dmolloy on topic Re: Comparative study of M42
great art work on those images. Classic Astronomy in these hi-tech days. like taking notes in school, i imagine that sketching an object teaches more than simply looking at it.

Question; Do you sketch and then produce image in negative (noticed spine if note pad also in negatative image?

declan

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.114 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum