- Posts: 2682
- Thank you received: 549
A load of Astronomy gear in Lidl
- Keith g
- Offline
- Super Giant
Less
More
16 years 11 months ago #55682
by Keith g
Replied by Keith g on topic Re:
Here ya go.....
www.lidl.ie/ie/home.nsf/pages/c.o.20071210.index
www.lidl.ie/ie/home_ni.nsf/pages/c.o.20071210.index
Keith...
www.lidl.ie/ie/home.nsf/pages/c.o.20071210.index
www.lidl.ie/ie/home_ni.nsf/pages/c.o.20071210.index
Keith...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DaveGrennan
- Offline
- IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
Less
More
- Posts: 2707
- Thank you received: 32
16 years 11 months ago #55802
by DaveGrennan
Is it just me or does 329 lids for a non-motorised achromatic refractor not seem like such good value? My opinion, the skylux is oodles better value.
Also I notice David Hinds is selling the C4-R for 189STG (about 263euro). Just food for thought.
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re: A load of Astronomy gear in Lidl
Bresser Messier R-102 Refractor Telescope
Is it just me or does 329 lids for a non-motorised achromatic refractor not seem like such good value? My opinion, the skylux is oodles better value.
Also I notice David Hinds is selling the C4-R for 189STG (about 263euro). Just food for thought.
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dave_lillis
- Offline
- Super Giant
16 years 11 months ago #55806
by dave_lillis
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Replied by dave_lillis on topic Re: A load of Astronomy gear in Lidl
so what are "anti-fog" hunting binoculars ??
Dave L. on facebook , See my images in flickr
Chairman. Shannonside Astronomy Club (Limerick)
Carrying around my 20" obsession is going to kill me,
but what a way to go.
+ 12"LX200, MK67, Meade2045, 4"refractor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jhoare
- Offline
- Red Giant
Less
More
- Posts: 521
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 11 months ago #55809
by jhoare
There's a big gap between a 70mm objective and a 102mm. The 70mm objective has 3848.45 square mm of light gathering area versus 8171.28 square mm for the 102mm, which is a 2.1 times difference. The Dawes Limit of the 70mm is 1.65 seconds of arc compared to 1.14 for the 102mm, and the maximum practical magnification for a 70mm achromat is generally held to be 140x versus 204x for the 102mm. Add to that 3 Plossls, a Barlow, a nice illuminated reticle finderscope, a polar scope and a sturdier tripod as opposed to the low cost accessories with the Skylux and you can see where the price difference comes from. Which is not to say that the Skylux is rubbish - it's very good value for the Lidl price and I already own one - but so is the R102.
English specialist retailers are selling the R102 for £349 and the Bresser RRP is €499, so in my book €329 at Lidl is good for that product. However given that the C4R is an end of line product a fair comparison with the R102 would be its replacement, the Omni XLT 102, which David Hinds prices at £329.
David Hinds won't sell direct into AI's 'territory' so the real question is what would be the total cost of getting it from a local dealer? The £189 price on offer in the UK is fair for an end of line product and the C4R does have a good reputation but there are less than a dozen in stock. Realistically, how many will be sold here rather than in the UK and Scandinavia (the UK, Ireland and Scandanavia is the area for which David Hinds is the Celestron distributor)?
All of the extras included in the R102 kit add value, particularly if it's a first time purchase and it's unfair to compare the bare bones C4R kit simply on the basis of price. The 10mm, 15mm & 25mm included Plossls, illuminated polarscope and 2x Barlow add significant value for a first time purchase when compared to the lone 25mm Plossl that comes with the C4R. The 8x50 illuminated reticle finderscope is also a genuine step up from the 6x30 model on the C4R. All told, I consider the R102 to be better value at the Lidl price - for just a little more money - I don't need the Plossls and Barlow but the other extras make up for the price difference in my book, and as a total package it doesn't need any immediate extras if chosen as a starter package.
And finally, the R102 also fits my LXD75 and Giro II mounts. So would the C4R - but the colour is all wrong
John
Better that old people should die of talk than to have young people die in war.
Replied by jhoare on topic Re: A load of Astronomy gear in Lidl
Bresser Messier R-102 Refractor Telescope
Is it just me or does 329 lids for a non-motorised achromatic refractor not seem like such good value? My opinion, the skylux is oodles better value.
Also I notice David Hinds is selling the C4-R for 189STG (about 263euro). Just food for thought.
There's a big gap between a 70mm objective and a 102mm. The 70mm objective has 3848.45 square mm of light gathering area versus 8171.28 square mm for the 102mm, which is a 2.1 times difference. The Dawes Limit of the 70mm is 1.65 seconds of arc compared to 1.14 for the 102mm, and the maximum practical magnification for a 70mm achromat is generally held to be 140x versus 204x for the 102mm. Add to that 3 Plossls, a Barlow, a nice illuminated reticle finderscope, a polar scope and a sturdier tripod as opposed to the low cost accessories with the Skylux and you can see where the price difference comes from. Which is not to say that the Skylux is rubbish - it's very good value for the Lidl price and I already own one - but so is the R102.
English specialist retailers are selling the R102 for £349 and the Bresser RRP is €499, so in my book €329 at Lidl is good for that product. However given that the C4R is an end of line product a fair comparison with the R102 would be its replacement, the Omni XLT 102, which David Hinds prices at £329.
David Hinds won't sell direct into AI's 'territory' so the real question is what would be the total cost of getting it from a local dealer? The £189 price on offer in the UK is fair for an end of line product and the C4R does have a good reputation but there are less than a dozen in stock. Realistically, how many will be sold here rather than in the UK and Scandinavia (the UK, Ireland and Scandanavia is the area for which David Hinds is the Celestron distributor)?
All of the extras included in the R102 kit add value, particularly if it's a first time purchase and it's unfair to compare the bare bones C4R kit simply on the basis of price. The 10mm, 15mm & 25mm included Plossls, illuminated polarscope and 2x Barlow add significant value for a first time purchase when compared to the lone 25mm Plossl that comes with the C4R. The 8x50 illuminated reticle finderscope is also a genuine step up from the 6x30 model on the C4R. All told, I consider the R102 to be better value at the Lidl price - for just a little more money - I don't need the Plossls and Barlow but the other extras make up for the price difference in my book, and as a total package it doesn't need any immediate extras if chosen as a starter package.
And finally, the R102 also fits my LXD75 and Giro II mounts. So would the C4R - but the colour is all wrong
John
Better that old people should die of talk than to have young people die in war.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Heebyjeeby
- Offline
- Proto Star
Less
More
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 11 months ago #55817
by Heebyjeeby
Replied by Heebyjeeby on topic Re: A load of Astronomy gear in Lidl
Would the R-102 be a good advanced starter scope? I was planning on spending a bit more and getting either a 8" Newt on a EQ5, or a 10" Dob. The R-102 does have a few nice extras like a polar scope and an illuminated finder scope. This would be my first telescope, so I am starting from scratch.
Have done a quick google search and seen the mount described a MON2(eq5)
Does this mean that the mount is equivalent to an EQ5? Could I buy a 8" Newt OTA with mounting rings and dovetail, and attach it? Could be a relatively cheap way to get two telescopes.
Have done a quick google search and seen the mount described a MON2(eq5)
Does this mean that the mount is equivalent to an EQ5? Could I buy a 8" Newt OTA with mounting rings and dovetail, and attach it? Could be a relatively cheap way to get two telescopes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Seanie_Morris
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 9640
- Thank you received: 547
16 years 11 months ago #55831
by Seanie_Morris
10" Dob! 10" DOB! Get the 10" Dob if it's on your I can afford this as a starterscope list!
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Replied by Seanie_Morris on topic Re: A load of Astronomy gear in Lidl
Would the R-102 be a good advanced starter scope? I was planning on spending a bit more and getting either a 8" Newt on a EQ5, or a 10" Dob. The R-102 does have a few nice extras like a polar scope and an illuminated finder scope. This would be my first telescope, so I am starting from scratch.
10" Dob! 10" DOB! Get the 10" Dob if it's on your I can afford this as a starterscope list!
Midlands Astronomy Club.
Radio Presenter (Midlands 103), Space Enthusiast, Astronomy Outreach Co-ordinator.
Former IFAS Chairperson and Secretary.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.128 seconds