- Posts: 567
- Thank you received: 0
Tonight's Moon...
- spculleton
- Offline
- Super-Nova
Deirdre: a very fine sketch indeed. Anto is right about the VMA - it's fantastic. One of the problems with Moon books is that they can sometimes emphasis completely different craters. Many of the ones you've id'd, for instance, I couldn't find off the top of my head, while others I could. There's many times I've been struck by an incredible looking crater with beautiful light-play across it, then when I've looked it up it's something small and insignificant, relatively speaking. Rukl's atlas is definitive, but cannot take the action of the terminator or libration into account, while the VMA can.
Here's a challenge: we're always told that you will never find a larger crater superimposed on a smaller crater on the Moon. It's a rule. Like all rules though there is one exception. It's on our nearside. Can you find it?
Shane Culleton.
Dozo Yoroshiku Onegai Shimasu
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
In terms of making it look natural Mick, how about having North up? Or do you have some Southern Hemisphere experience you'd like to share?
Deirdre: a very fine sketch indeed. Anto is right about the VMA - it's fantastic. One of the problems with Moon books is that they can sometimes emphasis completely different craters. Many of the ones you've id'd, for instance, I couldn't find off the top of my head, while others I could. There's many times I've been struck by an incredible looking crater with beautiful light-play across it, then when I've looked it up it's something small and insignificant, relatively speaking. Rukl's atlas is definitive, but cannot take the action of the terminator or libration into account, while the VMA can.
Here's a challenge: we're always told that you will never find a larger crater superimposed on a smaller crater on the Moon. It's a rule. Like all rules though there is one exception. It's on our nearside. Can you find it?
Thanks for the rotation coment. I knew there ws something "wrong" about the image (difference in no. of craters between hemispeheres etc) but was so caught up in the procesing that I mssed the "bigger picture", so to speak. Post above is now updated.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- spculleton
- Offline
- Super-Nova
- Posts: 567
- Thank you received: 0
I mssed the "bigger picture", so to speak. Post above is now updated.
You sure?
Want to take another look? :lol:
Shane Culleton.
Dozo Yoroshiku Onegai Shimasu
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DeirdreKelleghan
- Offline
- IFAS Social Media Officer
- Posts: 1509
- Thank you received: 47
Happy Lunatic
Deirdre
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
You sure?
Want to take another look? :lol:
No flies on you then! Want to take another look perhaps? Mabey the moon really is in the morning sky? Or mabey the middle photo is in the correct position but the other two are swapped?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- michaeloconnell
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
- Posts: 6332
- Thank you received: 315
Here's a challenge: we're always told that you will never find a larger crater superimposed on a smaller crater on the Moon. It's a rule. Like all rules though there is one exception. It's on our nearside. Can you find it?
BTW, I've been meaning to ask you, did you complete the Messier handbook yet?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.